User talk:SchreiberBike/Archive 7

Daniel Lubetzky
Hi SchreiberBike. My name is Sarah. I noticed that you made some recent edits to Daniel Lubetzky's article, and was hoping you would take a look at my edit request at Talk:Daniel Lubetzky. Hope to see you there! Thanks, SarahB2245dl (talk) 13:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the right approach to editing where you have a conflict of interest. I will take a look, but it will be a little while before I get there. Welcome to Wikipedia. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 03:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much. Looking forward! SarahB2245dl (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi @SchreiberBike - we worked together on some edits to Daniel Lubetzky's Wikipedia page back in 2021. A few weeks back I suggested some additional inclusions for his talk page - I'd love to see if you're open to reviewing those. SarahB2245dl (talk) 13:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Like last time, I'm kinda busy, but I'll look carefully, probably early next week. As more and more items are added to a page about a person, the page can begin to appear to be like a resume or to be promotional (See WP:NOTCV). I'd try to compare the page about Lubetzky to a fairly recent featured article about a similar person (no time now to look for one now, sorry). The more significant awards, etc. should be listed, but it's not encyclopedic to record every one. Back to you soon, SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 02:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * By the time I got there, had already taken care of things and I agree with their assessments. Thanks, to both of you. Again, I'd suggest limiting the article to just the most significant things rather than have it serve as a CV. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨  22:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @SchreiberBikethank you so much for getting back to me and for this feedback, which is incredibly useful. @Actualcpscm big thanks for jumping in to make these additions! SarahB2245dl (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Ecumenism
If you want that description I won't fuss. Editor2020 (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I looked at Ecumenism symbol.jpg and I wasn't sure it would be clear to everyone. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 21:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Impressive

 * Thank you. I'm not always in the mood for this, but it was fun and satisfying. I'll keep an eye on the GA review and help there as I'm able. Merry Christmas, Happy New Year and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 01:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Green Island
Ami Ayalon, the commando commander of an Israeli who led the attack on Green Island says that they suffered out of the 40 people who fought on the island. Only 2 were not injured or killed. Paraphrase the article. Battle of Green Island. Израильский эсминец Эйлат (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you want the source Израильский эсминец Эйлат (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have little knowledge of Middle Eastern history and little desire to involve myself in it. However, I found three articles which I think relate to your concerns: Ami Ayalon, Green Island (Egypt) and Operation Bulmus 6. I'm not sure what changes you would like to see to what articles. I suggest reading those articles to see where there are errors and suggesting those changes and the references to support them on the article's talk page. I hope that helps. (I hope you don't mind that I reformatted your questions slightly.) SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨  02:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, Ami Ayalon himself said that Do you want the source with me the video You can watch it for yourself to make sure Израильский эсминец Эйлат (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * As I implied above, respectfully, I don't want to. I've given several suggestions above and on your talk page on how you might pursue this. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 23:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I get it, it's okay, thank you Израильский эсминец Эйлат (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Edit
I am sorry. 79.68.146.162 (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Apparently referencing this. No biggie, I was a 13 year old once too. Now do good. You can make the world better. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 17:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Aircraft in Fiction
Listen pal, I don’t know how to cite, but I’m telling the truth about the appearances of the P-51 and P-40 in the films I’ve listed. Check out the articles I’ve linked there, there’s no deception going on! I just thought that since those films which I know those planes star or appear in didn’t show up in the list, I should add them. Just because I don’t know how to cite doesn’t mean those additions should be taken away! Ace of Aces12 (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia. I don't doubt your knowledge (I've seen some of those movies and I know you are right). What I want to do is follow the instructions in the edit notice at the top of the editing window (see Template:Editnotices/Page/Aircraft in fiction). That notice has been basically the same since 2014; so there's a strong consensus to follow it. It makes it clear that the article is not intended to include every aircraft that appears in fiction. It says: "Third-party references are needed to show the notability of the appearance." and "If you don't supply a reliable reference your entry will be quickly removed". Since they weren't referenced, I removed them and I explained why.


 * Accuracy is important on Wikipedia and the citations help make sure that the information is accurate. If you want to add facts to Wikipedia, you need to learn to add citations. Also, please include edit summaries so everyone knows the purpose of your edit. It's how we work together to make the encyclopedia better. Thank you, SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 05:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft created page requestm
Hello, would it be a problem to approve my draft? It keeps getting no notice even tho everything info i typed and source is reliable HrvatskiNogomet (talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't approve drafts, but I looked at Draft:Armend Maroshi which you had edited and I can make some suggestions. I looked for other Croatian football wingers and found the articles Frane Vladislavić and Kruno Ivančić. I suggest looking at those articles and format and reference the article about Armend Maroshi similarly to those. You could also get cues from looking at other football players on F.C. Crotone. Good luck, and I might be able to help if you have any questions. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 06:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Danke Gerda! I see your name around and it is always a pleasure. Precious indeed. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 17:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Important Message
Mathsci (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

TOL Newsletter
Hey, I've finished making the Feb 2022 issue of the TOLN, I'd appreciate if you could give it a look over and help with the mass-messaging, since I don't know how the latter works. AryKun (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good, especially considering you are working on this in the midst of Wikicup, where you're doing well. I made some small changes with an explanatory note about one capitalization fix in the edit summary. I know nothing about mass messaging, but I found mw:Help:Extension:MassMessage which may help. Thank you and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 21:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 018



 * February 2022&mdash;Issue 018


 * Tree of Life


 * Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Western flycatcher (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Western flycatcher (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for you capitalization checks

 * Thank you! I've got it on my list to do capitalization and other fixes all the List of amphibians of ... lists, but I haven't got to it yet. When I saw your fixes to List of amphibians of South Africa, I made a few more. Welcome to Wikipedia and keep up the good work. Those Breviceps sure are cute. If you have any questions or there's anything I can help you with, just ask. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 21:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Tree of Life/Newsletter/019



 * March 2022&mdash;Issue 019


 * Tree of Life


 * Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

To you
Stop spreading propaganda and misinformation on Wikipedia. We all know that one specie never gave birth to another making theory of evolution as pseudoscientific as it gets. Emirthesenat (talk) 02:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 020



 * April 2022&mdash;Issue 020


 * Tree of Life


 * Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Coldplay
I appreciate your edit on the references, specially switching the number dates to written dates, but what's up with replacing [...] with ... on quotes that were cut short? Isn't [...] the correct way to do it? It is where I live anyway. I just wanted to clear that up because I don't want to revert your edit. --GustavoCza (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Thanks for the note. Every organization or publication has its own style. Wikipedia's Manual of Style guidance on ellipses is at MOS:... where it explains that we generally do not use the square brackets around ellipses, but "Occasionally, square brackets are placed around an ellipsis to make clear that it isn't original to the material being quoted, for example if the quoted passage itself contains an ellipsis". So generally, I only keep the square brackets if they are indicating something beyond a plain ellipsis. Does that make sense? Thanks and let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Also the date fixes are easy with User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates; it's not perfect (so I double check), but it takes care of a lot of otherwise tedious work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨  04:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Clarification needed
Greetings,

I'm hoping you can explain the grammatical rule or style standard that suggests that ""lists" should be capitalized in this context. All the best.  --~TPW 17:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello to the I can see that my edit summary was unclear. In that case we are asking the reader to "see" a specific list, so I thought it best to refer to the list by the name it has on Wikipedia. Like I'd write "for the species Canis familiaris, see Dog" because I'm directing them to an article by name rather than the topic of dogs. If the sentence had been "See these lists of covers of Time magazine", I think lower case would be right, but it said "For other decades, see Lists of covers of Time magazine" referring to a named list. There are bunch of examples at Hatnote which use the "see ..." format and those capitalize the link as the name of an article. Does that make sense to you? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨  21:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It affirms what I suspected, which is that you believe that Wikipedia article titles are, in and of themselves, proper names. That being the case, your edit summary was clear.  I ask again for you to cite a specific policy, or style manual entry, that supports your supposition, as my comment requesting same was evidently not clear.  All the best.~TPW 13:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do "believe that Wikipedia article titles are, in and of themselves, proper names." It seems uncontroversial that when referring to an article title as an article title, it is a proper name. I can't think of a guideline that states that directly, but it certainly is common practice. I looked at the article Wikipedia, did a ctl-f for "see" and looked for links to article titles that begin with common nouns. The first five are:
 * see List of Wikipedias
 * All of them capitalize the titles as proper nouns. I haven't found "a specific policy, or style manual entry, that supports [my] supposition", but it seems apparent that Wikipedia article titles are proper nouns when referred to as article titles. Do you find that clear? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 15:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * All of them capitalize the titles as proper nouns. I haven't found "a specific policy, or style manual entry, that supports [my] supposition", but it seems apparent that Wikipedia article titles are proper nouns when referred to as article titles. Do you find that clear? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 15:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * All of them capitalize the titles as proper nouns. I haven't found "a specific policy, or style manual entry, that supports [my] supposition", but it seems apparent that Wikipedia article titles are proper nouns when referred to as article titles. Do you find that clear? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 15:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * All of them capitalize the titles as proper nouns. I haven't found "a specific policy, or style manual entry, that supports [my] supposition", but it seems apparent that Wikipedia article titles are proper nouns when referred to as article titles. Do you find that clear? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 15:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * All of them capitalize the titles as proper nouns. I haven't found "a specific policy, or style manual entry, that supports [my] supposition", but it seems apparent that Wikipedia article titles are proper nouns when referred to as article titles. Do you find that clear? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 15:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

ANI thread related to discussion in which you participated
Hi, just notifying you of this ANI thread connected to a discussion on the MoS talkpage. Boynamedsue (talk) 17:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Edit to "Sterling silver"
Hey, IP user here, just notifying you that I fixed a broken image on the "Sterling silver" article. I think your change on July 4th caused to break - the name for the file had "c. 1875" in it, which you had changed to a "circa" template, meaning it couldn't reference the image file. It is a bit weird that the image file's name itself had "c. 1875" in the first place, but it should be good now. 128.163.248.203 (talk) 19:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for cleaning up after me! I made the mistake and didn't realize it. Welcome to Wikipedia and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 19:50, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Board of Trustees election
Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Script assisted date changes within citations
Please note: MOS:NUM does not apply to citations, and it explicitly says as much. WP:CITESTYLE states dates should be presented with big, or little, endianness (DD-MM-YYYY, YYYY-MM-DD) but not mixed endian (M-D-Y, etc).

Also: citation tools built into the Web interface automagically populate the 'date' parameter in D-M-Y format.

Please try not to alter them too much going forward. Thank you. -- dsprc   [talk]  01:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

October music
Thank you for your interesting question! - reformation and a cat treat -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I'd admired that poplar when I was on your user page earlier today and now I admire the cat too (I'd hoped for music to play, but I was disappointed ). I don't speak any German, but I can make sense of a lot of what I read in that language and I was concerned that there was something I was missing with the single digits where I expected a date. After knowing it wasn't a language problem, I did some research and found that the article was translated from German Wikipedia but for some reason they hadn't taken the whole date which I could find in the original. Keep being yourself. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 00:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

"Big hat boy" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Big hat boy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Randi Moth (talk) 22:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit to "Time Person of the Year"
I was originally going to explain that I had removed a mention in the 2011 section of the riots in the UK given that the reference does not mention them, but I see now that they are written about in another page of the source. My mistake--thanks for the correction. Adam8410 (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. If there is no explanation for an edit in the edit summary, I sometimes revert only on that basis. Edit summaries are the first line of communication between editors. Welcome to Wikipedia and have fun. If there's anything I can do to help or if you have any questions, just ask and I'll do my best. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 14:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Explanation:
Hi there, why did you reverted this edit? I was trying to reinsert the content that has been removed and I found a source for this claim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1130609369&oldid=1130601882&title=History_of_Target_Corporation

Thanks. -- 2601:205:C001:EA0:D0E8:B9D7:7381:E7F5 (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, thanks for your note. My edit summary said "Undo unexplained edit. That's too fine grained for an article about the company." By "too fine grained" I mean that in an article about the history of Target Corporation, it is not necessary or helpful to include detailed information about one store. There are over a thousand Target stores. If we included a paragraph about each store, the article would be too long and would be less valuable to the reader. Does that answer your question? SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 03:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes it is. -- 2601:205:C001:EA0:D0E8:B9D7:7381:E7F5 (talk) 04:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

List of Nancy Drew (2019 TV series) episodes
I do see that the same IP editor is using unsourced content, but if you see any IP editor putting unsourced content in any article relating to TV series, revert the edit. CastJared (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, SchreiberBike!


Happy New Year! SchreiberBike, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 20:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 20:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

"Glearwing" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Glearwing and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Randi Moth (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you Gerda, You help me feel precious. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 22:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

"Typo" in reference
Hi SchreiberBike. I wanted to let you know that in this edit, while you were correct to change the "m" to a comma, changing "190" to "19" was incorrect because the citation was to "issue 190" of the magazine, dated "December 2018". I've now converted the reference to use the template. Thanks for your efforts nevertheless. XAM2175 (T) 11:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * . Thank you for catching and fixing my mistake and alerting me. I'm sorry. I should have been more careful and I appreciate your diligence. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 23:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries! XAM2175  (T) 01:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for catching that error on the automatic taxobox. I try to go around the wiki cleaning up taxoboxes, but I don't usually get a "parenthetical" taxon like that. Векочел (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, that system is complex for an amateur like me. I used to spend a bunch of time on species pages and knew some of the ins and outs. I'm glad I was able to figure out the fix. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 03:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

North Dakota bats
I was writing about three bats added to North Dakota mammal list i can’t find proof of the fringed bat or the two free tailed bats added to the site I did however found three more that are not on there and have proof for them Cando1889 (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

I ment fringed tailed bat

But the three not listed are north long eared bat ,western small foot myotis and the long legged myotis Cando1889 (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks like you are talking about your edits at List of mammals of North Dakota and it looks to me like you are doing good work. The thing to do is to format your changes like the work that was there before. I appreciate that you've been using edit summaries; that's how Wikipedia editors tell each other why they've made a change. Keep it up. If you have any questions or anything, let me know. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 03:28, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you I will. Cando1889 (talk) 03:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Answer to Indiewood question
≈ indicates a National Film Registry inductee; see notes below Espngeek (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I see it now. I missed it when I looked twice before, so either I'm not having a good day or maybe it should be in a more prominent location, maybe right under the heading ==List of selected notable and important Indiewood/Indie films==, but that might not work well either. I'm out of ideas tonight. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 03:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Is this the right information about wild kratts season 7
https://wildkratts.fandom.com/wiki/Season_7 if this is right u can put it on the wild kratts episodes Wikipedia page Booe 1999 (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Sorry for the slow reply. No. A Fandom wiki is not a reliable source for things to be added to Wikipedia. At WP:UGC it explains that user generated content, which is what most wikis are, can not be used as a reliable source for Wikipedia. Review the page for reliable sources at Reliable sources to better understand why. Basically, "articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Those rule pages are long and complicated, but they make sense once you get to know them. Please be nice to people, avoid rudeness and you can be a valuable part of Wikipedia. Let me know if I can clarify or help in any other way. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨  00:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Ocypode gaudichaudii
Hi. You have made a edit in good faith, but in error. You changed eating juvenile to juvenile eating. I've changed it back. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing out my error. It has not yet been corrected. Would it be right to say that's an adult Ocypode gaudichaudii eating a juvenile Ocypode gaudichaudii? Or is it an adult Ocypode gaudichaudii eating something else which is juvenile? I'm not sure how to fix it. Thanks, SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 20:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm still not sure how to fix this. Should it be "An adult Ocypode gaudichaudii eating a juvenile Ocypode gaudichaudii" or "An adult Ocypode gaudichaudii eating", or what? Thank you for sharing your photos! SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 16:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * My guess would be that it is eating a juvenile of its own species, but that would be a guess so best to just say 'eating'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ✅ SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 17:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Saruman Museum
How are you?Im still missing Rugeiroland but there it is. Would you take a a look at this Saruman page Never got the hang of ISBNs Did you see that our erstwhile associate Velerie (Wikifrance) is now a Membre of the Legion d'Honeur Warm regards Notafly (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. I'm editing Wikipedia less but getting other important things done. I did some editing on Saruman Museum and it looks pretty good. I've not heard from Ruigeroeland either; his baby must be five years old now. I'm not sure who Velerie is, but a Legion d'Honeur is quite an accomplishment. My best to you and I hope you are doing well, SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 21:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Very many thanks Valerie' s project is here [https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portail:Histoire_de_la_zoologie_et_de_la_botanique#:~:text=Historiquement%2C%20les%20premi%C3%A8res%20r%C3%A9flexions%20scientifiques,objet%20l'%C3%A9tude%20des%20v%C3%A9g%C3%A9taux. Portail:Histoire_de_la_zoologie_et_de_la_botanique] (Just under 9, 000 articles).Now she is known for her beautifully cocnceived and illustrated books Notafly (talk) 19:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 21



 * August 2023&mdash;Issue 021


 * Tree of Life


 * Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!

Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)