User talk:Schwertleite~enwiki

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dr.K. logos 14:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Additional comment: One more revert on Olympic Airlines and you will be reported to WP:ANI/3RR. Dr.K. logos 17:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

3RRBot has reported you
Hello Schwertleite. See this report. Please join the discussion at Talk:Olympic Airlines. EdJohnston (talk) 17:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Olympic Airlines
The reason I reverted the skytrax link was that you had been edit warring over it with other editors, who had asked you to participate in discussion about it. You then added it back again without engaging at article talk. The point of a discussion is to come to consensus first, not for reversion warring to continue before a conclusion is reached or the moment that one person agrees with you. Mfield (talk) 17:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on March 20 2009 to Olympic Airlines
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Olympic Airlines Privatization
I have nominated Olympic Airlines Privatization, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Olympic Airlines Privatization. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mfield (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No problems on the help, I am not trying to remove what you have contributed, rather I am trying to make sure it meets our guidelines. Regarding the Greek, Google translate does a good enough job to verify what is being said Mfield (Oi!) 15:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The sytrax section - that is what I meant when I removed it. It cannot stand alone. For it to be included it needs to be part of a section on what lead to the airlines problems, and thus the customer service issues would need to be linked to the airlines financial woes directly by reliable sources. It may seem to be obvious that their bad customer service has not helped them (I have been a dissatisfied customer of theirs myself by the way) but we can't make the leap to say so, someone notable has to do that. 15:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As you re-added it while I was typing the above, please revert your re-addition of that section until it can be written in correctly. It cannot stand alone. Mfield (Oi!) 15:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I am worried that you are not adding the references from the Greek press that explain that the customer service is a factor. Your edit summary "I think that..." shows the problem. You cannot include claims and facts without context because you think they are relevant, we need someone or something to make them notable. I am not disagreeing that customer service probably played a part in their issues, but this is an encyclopedia article, not "Mfield and Schwertleite's Opinions on the Privatization of Olympic Airlines". You see what I mean. Mfield (Oi!) 15:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This conversation needs to continue on article talk though, or other editors will not understand or realize that we are communicating about this. Mfield (Oi!) 15:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You cannot use what you think is implied by someone as the basis for inclusion of material. This has been explained to you by myself and another editor several times already. We can only use what has been reported directly. That is the basis of our verifiability standard. You are reaching for a desired conclusion based on your loose interpretation of what someone has said. It is not acceptable. Please find a source that directly links bad customer service to the airlines problems and privatization and refrain from attempting to readd the section until you have one and consensus has been reached on article talk.'' Mfield (Oi!) 19:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Schwertleite. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Schwertleite~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)