User talk:SciKal

Welcome!
Hello, SciKal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Problems
Your new article has some problems, the most glaring of which is that it does not contain a lead section to describe what it is about. You launch into a string of mathematical derivations without telling readers what it is you are deriving or why. Please try to provide a lead section to give the rest of the article some context. Then, also provide some references to verify your article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peierls substitution
Hello SciKal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peierls substitution for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The almost anti-symmetric gauge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The almost anti-symmetric gauge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The almost anti-symmetric gauge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MaoGo (talk) 08:25, 19 October 2018 (UTC)