User talk:Scieberking/Archives/2010/January

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! &mdash; John Cardinal (talk) 16:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Scrotumless
I don't have the balls to say it to your face?? That's a good one. If I came here looking for an argument, the law abiding wiki citizen you are you are likely to report me or just kick up a fuss. I think you are making much ado about nothing. I already redirected the information in the article into the guitarist article before the AFD ended as I couldn't redirect it during an AFD. But nobody commented after I did so it is impossible to say if people approved of the merge. I try to see it from a condesning point of view. We are an encyclopedia. Would an encyclopedia have a general article on a guitarist or a seperate list of those "considered the greatest". It makes sense to merge and the lists now look quite natural within the guitarist article. I really cannot understand you calling me uncivil. The list are exactly the same but in a more convenient place to accompany the article on guitarist. I really haven't the time to fuss over something like. Time would be better spent writing a decent article on Guitarist and writing about techniques. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 14:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

The thing is, you yourself said "This article's rather sub-standard and been a target of serious vandalism for months.". This is true. So why not work together and buld it into a more formal higher standard article which is on watchlists and assume good faith on both parts. When somebody comes to me talk page accusing me of being uncivil I don't take it too kindly. If you had simply said, why did you redirect the list so soon after AFD closure I'd have told you what I said about, without the animosity. Obviously you have an interest in guitar, so we share something in common. My warmest regards. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 14:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I meant "uncivil" in a sense of "lacking good manners" only because consensus was reached to KEEP the article, not to MERGE. Did not mean anything else, or that you were being uncivil. My exact statement was "That (act) is quite uncivil I think". Yeah, I agree that the article is a lousy one, and I've spent 5 or 10 minutes to clean it up for vandalism and several other issues. Thank you very much. Sincerely --Scieberking (talk) 14:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Duplicated
I have removed it, it would perhaps be better and clearer if you removed your duplicated comment, I will do it if you don't mind, it will cause confusion. thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Removed myself. Thanks. --Scieberking (talk) 23:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)