User talk:ScienceAdvisor

Nomination of ATHLYT for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ATHLYT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ATHLYT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. US-Verified (talk) 11:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ATHLYT


A tag has been placed on ATHLYT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Time Force for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Time Force is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Time Force until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mercenf (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Time Force Corporate Logo Small.png
Thanks for uploading File:Time Force Corporate Logo Small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

is closed. Weird. "Arbitration committee ultimately decided that I was the target of a editing ring and that my block was reduced to 6 months.. Today should be 6 months exactly. I request my account and all the IP's that have been blocked be restored. I was originally blocked on March 4th. Today is Sept 3rd." I'm afraid I would need more than an unverified UTRS ticket to this effect. And as the block log still shows this is an indefinite checkuser block, I told 'em to email ArbCom. Courtesy ping --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)