User talk:Sciencegiants137

Your submission at Articles for creation: Femi101 (December 12)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Femi101 Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: ChatGPT spam.

 Qcne  (talk)  19:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Femi101


A tag has been placed on Draft:Femi101, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Qcne  (talk)  19:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Sciencegiants137/sandbox


The page User:Sciencegiants137/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir / Madam, Thanks for your message. Did a human review the submission (or was it automated)?
 * I'm rather surprised (but also, unfortunately, not that surprised) that the first professor of petroleum engineering in all of Africa would fail to meet the inclusion criteria despite the objective detailing and extensive referencing throughout the article.
 * To be clear, the erasure of erasure of black academics' contributions to society is a problem that extends way beyond Wikipedia. But nevertheless, notable figures of African origin deserve much better representation on this platform. Full stop.
 * In the spirit of being constructive, I'd greatly appreciate any advice you can provide to advance the submission. The importance of this article goes far beyond the people on this message chain.
 * Kind regards Sciencegiants137 (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * While there are bots at Wikipedia that automate the more trivial editing tasks, all drafts are reviewed by fellow editors. Your draft and sandbox content has been deleted, but that is because at least two actual people reviewed the content and found it to be blatantly promotional. This is not a decision whether your article's subject merits inclusion at Wikipedia; it is solely a decision that the draft you wrote was blatantly promotional to the point of meriting deletion. If you would like to try writing a new draft, keeping Wikipedia's neutrality, verifiability, and spam guidelines in mind, you are free to do so. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood, Dan. (and genuinely apologies for being quite presumptuous there...)
 * I'll have a go at edit-ing the article and will keep my fingers crossed re the next submission. Thanks for the feedback & advice either way.
 * Cheers Sciencegiants137 (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Femi101


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Femi101, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)