User talk:ScoobyTrips

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brighton have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brighton was changed by ScoobyTrips (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870828 on 2021-01-21T17:32:36+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brighton and Hove. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brighton and Hove was changed by ScoobyTrips (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880843 on 2021-01-21T17:33:10+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of supporting Harry Potter characters, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't realise my edits were disruptive. ScoobyTrips (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

A thorough explanation of Günther, at al. (2018) has been provided at the talk page at Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer. Your edits directly contradict the expressed language in the supplementary material file of that study, as shown in the inline citation, and are therefore considered vandalism. Continuing to revert the page will result in a ban, that I promise you. Hunan201p (talk) 01:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)