User talk:Scorebord

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Radium, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 20:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harrison Friedman


A tag has been placed on Harrison Friedman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 23:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Austin, Texas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Austin, Texas was changed by Scorebord (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880039 on 2011-10-19T00:18:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Bieber. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Creation7689 (talk) 01:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Keep Austin Weird, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Keep Austin Weird was changed by Scorebord (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.99459 on 2011-11-02T21:29:38+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ferrari 458 Italia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. 72Dino (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Africanized Bee, you may be blocked from editing. -- Why Not A Duck 01:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Africanized bee. Tgeairn (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tide  rolls  02:36, 6 January 2012 (UTC) I appeal my block, becuase in many instances, I used constructive editing, like I did to Ian Kinsler and to Beagle. Please, unreject me.

You mean Zorkianized bob. Poopy bob means killer bee.
 * So we should allow you to edit because sometimes you try to be constructive, and sometimes you change "Africanized bee" to "Poopy bob" after being warned to stop? I don't think so.  NawlinWiki (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC)