User talk:Scorpion0422/Archive 18

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

The Nobel prize winners
What are you thinking about that article, it's constantly being the object of mutilations. Many people, icluding me, have been trying to change countries' names to what they consider more appropriate. If the name should be taken from the website, it must be written in the head of the table or the page should be protected for an uncertain term. Ales (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on January 6, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/January 6, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director,. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch ™ and ©  20:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

 

"Homer's Enemy" is the 23rd episode of the eighth season of American animated television series The Simpsons. It first aired on the Fox network in the United States on May 4, 1997. The plot of the episode centers on the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant's hiring of a new employee named Frank Grimes. Homer attempts to befriend Grimes; however, Grimes takes an instant dislike to Homer, angered by his laziness and incompetence, and eventually declares himself Homer's enemy. The episode was directed by Jim Reardon and the script was written by John Swartzwelder, based on an idea pitched by executive producer Bill Oakley. The episode explores the comic possibilities of a realistic character with a strong work ethic placed alongside Homer in a work environment. The show's staff worked hard to perfect the character of Frank Grimes. He was partially modeled after Michael Douglas as he appeared in the film Falling Down. Hank Azaria provided the voice of Frank Grimes, and based some of the characters' mannerisms on actor William H. Macy. "Homer's Enemy" is considered to be one of the darkest episodes of The Simpsons and is a favorite of several members of the production staff. Although Grimes makes his only appearance in this episode, he was later named one of the "Top 25 Simpsons Peripheral characters" by IGN. (more...)

Add Jeff Westbrook...
...To the list of writers who've edited here... User:Jeffrw. The information he added to his page was previously put there by the Fox IP I thought was Jean himself... Anyway, I'll ask him for some images. Gran2 12:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

List of IIHF World Under-20 Championship medalists
Please do not remove the hosts for the future editions. They have been confirmed from the IIHF. Intoronto1125 (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
I am very thankful for your appreciation of my work on the Simpsons season thirteen articles. I wish you happy editing and a smashing new year! Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Olympic venues
I need your opinion on something. I am working on getting a list of all of the Olympic venues created. The question is how far do you think I should go: From 1896 Athens to 2008 Beijing, 1896 Athens to 2012 London, or 1896 Athens to 2016 Rio for the Summer? From 1924 Chamonix to 2010 Vancouver or 1924 Chamonix to 2014 Sochi for the Winter? Right now I am thinking going 1896 to 2008 for Summer and 1924 to 2010 for Winter like what we do for the medalists. Thoughts on this? Chris (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Decided to include 2012, 2014, and 2016 in Olympic venues listings after all. Please disregard. Chris (talk) 22:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Mort license plates
This guy keeps adding that Bart was originally going to be called Mort. His source is indeed a video interview with Bonnie Pietila, where she does indeed say that Bart was called Mort for one day. Does that really merit inclusion? I don't care, so I'll leave it you. Gran2 22:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, as happens to me everyday, Jim Brooks himself just told me this wasn't true. I love Twitter. Gran2 00:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Stark Raving Dad
It's very fair of you to let me know that it's coming up for another review, but I'm fine with letting other reviewers look at it -- I have no special rights to review it just because I opposed it last time. Good luck with it, and thanks for letting me know. Mike Christie (talk – library) 03:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to, who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by , with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to, who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, , who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Elitists
I like to think its because they would have no idea whatsoever how to write an article about a topic like The Simpsons themselves so instead just react with confusion and anger. Gran2 11:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Criticism of one episode of the Simpsons being a featured article
I can't quite understand your (slightly heated) reaction to my comments on this. I did not in any way suggest that you should not be writing your articles, nor did I impugn their quality. I just questioned whether an article about one episode of a series that has hand hundreds should be highlighted on the home page of Wikipedia. I think that's a place for articles of general interest. I agree that there have been some other rather 'niche' articles. I'd quite like to avoid them too. That's all. 11:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawebster (talk • contribs)

CSD notification
Please don't forget to notify the creator of an article when you nominate for CSD, e.g. List of The Simpsons traveling episodes-- SPhilbrick  T  15:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Just adding thoughts
Hey, I created as you put it 'minor' character sections on the List of recurring characters in The Simpsons page. However, these minor characters were infact recurring. The page is called List of recurring characters in The Simpsons, not List of major characters in The Simpsons. If it was given this title by mistake or misunderstanding then please change the title. Characters like Patches and Poor Violet are a lot less recurring than some of the characters I added. I can assume you had great reasons for reverting my edits, but I just want to be sure. Thanking you, for some reason. :) 220.244.162.100 (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Reasons for for reverting my edits?
If I did something wrong it's fine, but could please explain what was wrong with my edits to the two Simpsons episodes? I understand the "Funeral For a Friend" one, because that was speculation, but what did I do wrong in "The Bob Next Door", it looked perfectly legit to me. I understand, if whatever I did was wrong, but you please explain to me what I did? Simply saying "reverted edits by MJN SEIFER" makes it look like you're accusing me of vandalism, which I wasn't doing. MJN SEIFER (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE.

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Betty's Hope]].

 * I had missed the obvious. Thanks for the review.-- Nvvchar . 02:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK Bleeker Ridge
Hello! Your submission of Bleeker Ridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The article is all good, but it might be too far past 5 days to meet the rules, depending on backlog. I removed (pictured) from the hook because there's no image in nomination. --Dbratland (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for MacHomer
Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Bleeker Ridge
Materialscientist (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Unfunny Dad
I just sat through last Sunday's horror show... The less said about that the better. Any idea who Maurice LaMarche voiced so I can update the guest star list? Gran2 15:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, Nick Park just voiced himself. Fairly sure the Wallace rip-off was Dan. Gran2 16:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well he said on NoHomers that he wasn't an insider, so I guess he's maybe a journalist or something...? Gran2 01:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to (first, with 487 points) and  (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Question
Hi, sorry but there's no online source which is accessible to everyone. I thought it would be OK if I add that info, as it's nearly impossible to find any official source. Fox doesn't state writers and directors in it's press releases at FoxFlash (as CBS does for instance). I have been adding this to some shows like Bones, Lie to Me etc., but I'll stop as lately it frequently gets reverted. Dr. Vicodine (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Featured list removal candidates/List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment/archive1
Nergaal (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Simpsons FLC
Not sure if you missed my comments or haven't had time, but I did a review at Featured list candidates/The Simpsons (season 13)/archive1 that is probably holding up its promotion.  Jujutacular  talk 16:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is with 231 points, who leads Pool H.  (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 01:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

The Simpsons (season 23): PABFxx
Just to ask, but are you sure it's not okay to count PABFxx as the season 23 production line yet, as "The Man In the Blue Flannel Pants" is already confirmed from USCDb as being PABF01? KnownAlias   contact   22:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

FLC
Hey, if you have time could you weigh in here? A user asked me to, I will, but don't have much season FLC experience. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  00:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 April newsletter
Round 2 of the 2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.

This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to and  who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored; featured sounds, featured portals and featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to (who has been eliminated) for his work on In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!

Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HurricaneNeddy.png
 Thanks for uploading File:HurricaneNeddy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Milhouse Divided.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Milhouse Divided.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marge and Homer Wedding.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Marge and Homer Wedding.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BartAfterDark.png
 Thanks for uploading File:BartAfterDark.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

And now what's 'it' seems weird and scary to me
I've been thinking lately, dangerous I know, but there we are. I don't ever plan to leave this place, but the fact is I don't really have all that much time for substantive editing anymore; and ever since Left, well, left, from an organizational point of view the project has been pretty stagnant. But recently some of the newer users (namely Queenieacoustic and Thardin12) have of course been doing some highly impressive work on some of the bad episode's bad articles, while today this guy posted some topics on the project page; I didn't really agree with his suggestions, but hey, at least he was keen. Anyway, my point is, I think we should hold some kind of 'meeting' with them to 'hand-over' the 'reins' in order to kick-start the project a bit. I don't know, maybe give them some advice, make sure they have Newsbank and point out what needs to be done (namely, the complete re-doing of some of the older episode pages, which if anybody noticed would be up at GAR pretty damn quick). So, yeah, does this sound like a good idea? Gran2 21:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I will endeavour to do this at some point this week... meanwhile looks like Jay Kogen has been writing his own page. It's well written/formatted, albeit totally unsourced. Gran2 13:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm. If this is a simple "she doesn't want it there because she doesn't like it" even if it is true, then it should be put back. It's reliably sourced and Wikipedia is not censored, so if she doesn't like it: tough. It's not like the UK where she could pay for a superinjunction to prevent freedom of speech and of the press. Gran2 17:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Question
Do you have Global TV where you live? Apparently they are airing new episodes of The Simpsons and Family Guy an hour before Fox does. Why would Fox allow that? C T J F 8 3 20:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahhh, ok, ya, I guess if they want the show in Canada, they won't complain much. Ya, I didn't think it was notable, just thought it odd it aired before America. Thanks for the explanation! C T J F 8 3  03:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Season 14 colors
Hi Gran2! A little while ago, I added the Season 14 DVD boxart to the season 14 article. I also changed the colors on some of the tables to match the boxart, but the season's episodes still have the gray color. How do I change the color on the episode articles? I asked Ctjf83,‎ but he told me to ask you, so... Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

re Nancy Cartwright
That appears to be vandalism. The actual complaint, is best dealt with through WP:OTRS, and NOT by vandalizing the page! -- Cirt (talk) 21:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Comic Book Guy
How could his appearance on The Cleveland Show possibly be a problem? Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 15:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ISMovie.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ISMovie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. C T J F 8 3 18:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Last Exit to Springfield.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Last Exit to Springfield.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. C T J F 8 3 20:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Copyright Infringement
Your addition to The Great Simpsina has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please do not copy and paste large amounts of copyrighted text. For more information, check Wikipedia's policy on copyrights at WP:COPY. Thanks, Cavenba (talk • contribs) 14:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * You are correct in that it was cited properly. However, that is not this issue. The issue is that it violates United States Copyright law. Copying large amounts a text is not covered by fair use and therefore remains under copyright. If you haven't heard of this policy, may I direct you to: WP:COPYPASTE. But, just to hammer in the point: "As a general rule, DO NOT COPY-PASTE TEXT FROM OTHER WEBSITES". Since this is now disputed, I will continue with Wikipedia's guidelines for copyright infringement, as seen at WP:CP. And, for the record, I'm not 'new here'. Thank you, Cavenba (talk • contribs) 22:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC).


 * I didn't think you were an admin or ORTS agent, the only ones it says are authorized to remove copyvio templates... Regardless, you cannot have "non-commercial" things on Wikipedia, as its contents can be used for commercial purposes, keep reading the policies. Cavenba (talk • contribs) 18:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter
We're half way through round 3 of the 2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by, and  respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:36, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FridayGannonMotherSimpson.png
 Thanks for uploading File:FridayGannonMotherSimpson.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

FYI
Today's featured article/requests Dabomb87 (talk) 17:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

MacHomer
Never heard of that one before. Brilliant work on the article! :) Theleftorium (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll have a closer look at MacHomer later today. But it does look ready for GA already! And yes I'd really appreciate it if you could check Simpsonology! But I have An Uncensored, Unauthorized History so I can look that up myself. Theleftorium (talk) 10:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't seem to find the mention. Do you know what page? Theleftorium (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh, don't bother looking through Simpsonology if it's too much trouble! Pinsky's book is available in preview mode on Google Books so I'll see if I can get some more stuff out of that. And I'll definitely try to incorporate that GLAAD article (it hasn't been used). Thanks for all the help! :) Theleftorium (talk) 16:31, 26 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Really? Interesting... That would explain why she wants such a reclusive personal life. Maybe she and David are just roommates á la Will and Grace? ;) Theleftorium (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, it can probably be added after the sentence "Patty was suspected by fans and the press because she had not often been seen dating men on the show". Theleftorium (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

MacHomer is definitely ready for GA now! You should nominate it. :) Theleftorium (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Does Pinsky's book mention anything else about the LGBT tourism having a basis in reality (that page isn't available on Google Books)? Maybe an example? Unfortunately we can't use the Fort Lauderdale info since the reference doesn't mention The Simpsons. Theleftorium (talk) 19:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, I'll readd it then with the Pinsky reference. Thanks! Theleftorium (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Portal
Why do you remove the D'oh project banner from the portal page? C T J F 8 3 20:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahh, ok. C T J F 8 3  22:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Our long search is over...
Yep those images are definitely free-use. And that is definitely Julie Kavner. Very nice find! Gran2 09:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Can't see it hurting to upload it. The Kavner image is probably the best we are going to get. Gran2 17:28, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * When you have some time, could you give me a dump of all of the info/page numbers from Ortved's chapter on Sam Simon not already mentioned on his page? As the UK edition is different and has I think had some stuff edited out. Thanks, Gran2 19:53, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * A shame indeed. Ah well. Gran2 23:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 June newsletter
We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by, claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by , who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by, who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.

No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.

We would again like to thank and  for invaluable background work, as well as all of those helping to provide reviews for the articles listed on WikiCup/Reviews. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.

Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Simpsons No Doubt.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Simpsons No Doubt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Family tree
Well it is useful. To a fan. But this isn't a fan site. Also, if it is just copied from the book, isn't it technically copyright infringement? Or at least, it doesn't really satisfy fair-use policy. I don't have a huge problem with it, but I would come down on the side of 'It doesn't belong here'. Gran2 08:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I think it is best to distinguish between the two things, so probably just stick to the unofficial things. And yeah, there's probably enough sources to make an article for the porno, the 30 Rock one has one. Gran2 19:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah I just had a quick look, but I can't really see anything. One thing we can create though is List of The Simpsons showrunners of some kind. I've just got Mike Reiss's page to do and then that's a new GT. Gran2 22:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That was my thinking, an explanation of what the showrunner does and means, a history of the role, as in, what each one did, how popular they are, that kind of thing. Ortved's book, and quite a few of the sources I used for Oakley and Mirkin's pages do explain the role very well. I think it would be possible. Gran2 22:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bart Wants What It Wants ref 2 and 10 page numbers
Hi Scorpion! On September 3, 2010, you added the two Toronto Star articles "Simpsons Day? No way, dude" and "Rest easy, Mel, you're ignored - Simpsons' T.O. visit short on time but long on laughs", but their page numbers are missing. Is there any way you could find and add the page numbers to the article? Thanks in advance! :) Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter
We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are (Pool A, 189 points) and  (Pool B, 165 points). The number of points required to reach the next round is not clear at this time; there are some users who still do not have any recorded points. Please remember to update your submissions' pages promptly. In addition, congratulations to PresN, who scored the first featured topic points in the competition for his work on Thatgamecompany related articles. Most points this round generally have, so far, come from good articles, with only one featured article (White-bellied Sea Eagle, from ) and two featured lists (Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story, from PresN and Grammy Award for Best Native American Music Album, from ). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!

There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 11:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

FTRC
I would like to let you know that I have put Featured topics/Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions up for FTRC (again). GamerPro64 16:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes
Please be advised of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vanier06.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Vanier06.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter
The finals are upon us; we're down to the last few. One of the eight remaining contestants will be this year's WikiCup champion! 150 was the score needed to progress to the final; just under double the 76 required to reach round 4, and more than triple the 41 required to reach round 3. Our eight finalists are:


 * , Pool A's winner. Casliber has the highest total score in the competition, with 1528, the bulk of which is made up of 8 featured articles. He has the highest number of total featured articles (8, 1 of which was eligible for double points) and total did you knows (72) of any finalist. Casliber writes mostly on biology, including ornithology, botany and mycology.
 * , Pool B's winner and the highest scorer this round. PresN is the only finalist who has scored featured topic points, and he has gathered an impressive 330, but most of his points come from his 4 featured articles, one of which scored double. PresN writes mostly on video games and the Hugo Awards.
 * , Pool A's runner-up. Hurricanehink's points are mostly from his 30 good articles, more than any other finalist, and he is also the only finalist to score good topic points. Hurricanehink, as his name suggests, writes mostly on meteorology.
 * , Pool B's runner-up. Wizardman has completed 86 good article reviews, more than any other finalist, but most of his points come from his 2 featured articles. Wizardman writes mostly on American sport, especially baseball.
 * , the "fastest loser" (Pool A). Miyagawa has written 3 featured lists, one of which was awarded double points, more than any other finalist, but he was awarded points mostly for his 68 did you knows. Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, including dogs, military history and sport.
 * , the second "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Resolute's points come from his 9 good articles. He writes mostly on Canadian topics, including ice hockey.
 * , who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool A). Most of Evan's points come from his 10 good articles, and he writes mostly on meteorology.
 * , who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Phil's points come from his 9 good articles, 4 of which (more than any other finalist) were eligible for double points. He writes mostly on aeronautics.

We say goodbye to our seven other semi-finalists,, , , , , and. Everyone still in the competition at this stage has done fantastically well, and contributed greatly to Wikipedia. We're on the home straight now, and we will know our winner in two months.

In other news, preparations for next year's competition have begun with a brainstorming thread. Please, feel free to drop by and share any thoughts you have about how the competition should work next year. Sign ups are not yet open, but will be opened in due course. Watch this space. Further, there has been a discussion about the rule whereby those in the WikiCup must delcare their participation when nominating articles at featured article candidates. This has resulted in a bot being created by new featured article delegate. The bot will leave a message on FAC pages if the nominator is a participant in the WikiCup.

A reminder of the rules: any points scored after August 29 may be claimed for the final round, and please remember to update submission pages promptly. If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk:27 Club#Unsourced entries need to be removed
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:27 Club.  Sottolacqua  (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Page number
I don't know whether you have the book in range, but if you do, can you find me the page number in My Life as a 10 Year Old Boy where Nancy says "The thing about Hank that I most remember is that he started out so unassuming and then, little by little, his abilities were revealed and his contributions to the show escalated. I realized Hank was going to be our breakaway star." Thanks. Gran2 16:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * (talk page stalker) It's page 95. :) Theleftorium (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you (both of you). And it's about time Futurama got some proper recognition (well, I know "Roswell That Ends Well" won, but anyway). Even better: The Simpsons has now failed to win Outstanding Animated Program three years in a row, the first time that has ever happened. And about time to. Gran2 17:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

I need your input on something. As I asked Maitch, which do you think is better? The present structuring of Hank Azaria, where his career is recounted in a chronological order, with film and TV mixed up? Or this restructing here, where his TV and film roles are split into separate sections? I prefer to write biographies in the former style, but the latter is far clearer and easier to navigate and understand. Thanks. Gran2 16:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Request for clarification on TFA request
Hi Scorpion, can you clarify at WP:TFAR whether you wish "Stark Raving Dad" to be run on the 18th or 19th? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 18:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance (2)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on September 19, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/September 19, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors or his delegate, or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  19:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

 

"Stark Raving Dad" is the first episode of the third season of American animated television series The Simpsons. It originally aired on the Fox network in the United States on September 19, 1991. In the episode, main character Homer Simpson is sent to a mental institution, where he shares a room with a large white man named Leon Kompowsky who pretends to be Michael Jackson. Al Jean and Mike Reiss wrote the episode while Rich Moore served as director. Michael Jackson (pictured) guest starred in the episode as the speaking voice of Leon Kompowsky. For contractual reasons, he was credited as John Jay Smith in the closing credits. Jackson pitched several story ideas for the episode and wrote a song that is featured in the plot. He also stipulated that he would provide Kompowsky's speaking voice, but his singing voice would be performed by a sound-alike (Kipp Lennon) because he wanted to play a joke on his brothers. "Stark Raving Dad" received generally positive reviews from critics, particularly for the writing and Jackson's performance. (more...)

Clarification about List of Canada's Walk of Fame Inductees Page
Hi Scorpion. I just had a small question about the revert you did to my edit about Ryan Reynolds being inducted at a later date. I would like to know why you reverted it as I did source it with the Official press release that said just that. Ryan Reynolds will not be inducted at the same time as the others this year. First time in a long time, it seems. Thanks70.53.223.76 (talk) 02:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)samusek2

Hi Scorpion,. I'm a bit aggravated as I provided a valid source from Canada's Walk of Fame saying that Ryan Reynolds will not be inducted on October 1, 2011 like it states in your edit. The way that you put is that we should ignore the source and just merge the columns on the night of October 1, but according to sources, Reynolds will be unable to attend and he will be inducted at a later date, and will not be featured on the televised gala. It states that he will be inducted at a later date whether it be 2011 or 2012. (We don't know the specifics) If you merge the two columns on October 1, you are providing an untruth with regards as not all announced 2011 inductees will be inducted on the same day. WWe should keep Ryan Reynolds seperate from the other inductees until we know for sure when he will be able to get his star.

I'm sorry to get angry at you, but I think I am within the right to add this edit on to the page because I provided a valid source from the official commitee that says that one person's involvement has been postponed, and all that you are doing is reverting my edits, trying to sweep this fact under the carpet. As you said in your previous edit, why should it matter if the two columns will be merged in a month? Well, I thought Wikipedia was based on facts and sources, which I thought I had provided and you are selectfully omitting certain details thus allowing some inconsistencies in the article itself. You are the one that will be merging the two columns, and I don't think it would be fair and truthful to just merge Ryan Reynolds along with the other 2011 inductees into the main grid, if we still do not know when he will get inducted. That's what's getting me upset at your ways at handling the page. I did nothing wrong, just provided a valid source and I truly believe that tthere should be some sort of indication on the page at least that Ryan Reynold could not attend on October 1 due toi a scheduling conflict until we know of what will happen with Ryan Reynolds and Canada's walk of Fame. Feel free to answer me on the talk page or my talk page. Thank you.70.53.223.76 (talk) 21:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)samusek2

I understand what you are saying and yes we don't know what will happen I just thought that you would like to mention it in your own way.I was just wondering why you just chose to revert my edits. Why did you just use my source to make a valid note about it on the page in your own special way.

As for the second question you asked. Do not forget that the first time that Bryan Adams, Michael J Fox and Jim Carrey were first introduced in the early years of the Walk of Fame when there was no televised gala and was just a Toronto event ( I believe the first one was the year that Mike Myers was inducted). Now the whole ceremony is all televised and that is why they chose to rehonour Adams Carrey and Fox, due to the televised Gala and the fact that it might get more viewers to watch the show on TV. I think they always pick one inductee who is there due to their popularity. I do wonder what they will do with the time allotted for Reynolds.

I am sorry for arguing with you and you bring up some valid points, but It is true that we do not know what will happen until it actually happens. I just thought that since my source was from the actual committee that it deserved some sort of mention, maybe not a table, but a mention.70.53.223.76 (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)samusek2

Nomination of List of Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Wrestling Observer Newsletter awards (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 00:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 September newsletter
We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by, and , all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.

If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is, who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: (2007),  (2008),  (2009) and  (2010). The final standings were as follows:



Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.


 * The Featured Article Award:, for his performance in round 2. matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
 * The Good Article Award:, for his performance in round 4.
 * The Featured List Award:, for his performance in round 4. matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
 * The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics):, for his performance in round 3.
 * The Did You Know Award:, for his performance in round 1.
 * The In the News Award:, for his performance in round 1.
 * The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews):, for his performance in round 3.

No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.

Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Julie Kavner - This is my life.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Julie Kavner - This is my life.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:31, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Banner
Why? C T J F 8 3  20:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok, can you point me to the discussion, and I'll help revert if I catch it. That way I can link the users to the consensus if it gets to that point. C T J F 8 3  20:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Nah, I'm actually planning on editing less. I'm getting rid of my internet at home, so won't have the opportunity to edit as much. Plus I'm pretty much tired of all the BS on here....how are you? C T J F 8 3  20:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * that's cool...we still need DOH to get more GAs I should work on some, been a while C T J F 8 3  23:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

What's the episode/context of Homer saying, "So long jerkass"? Thanks, C T J F 8 3  17:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, when he takes the "angel" from where it starts in "Lisa the Skeptic", right? C T J F 8 3  17:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahhh, yes! Thanks! My brother and I keep saying it to each other and neither of us could remember the episode. Thanks! C T J F 8 3  19:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Futurama broadcast order
I've noticed you have been behind the push to re-establish broadcast order to Futurama articles. I would strongly suggest that you please stop. You ought to look at Talk:List of Futurama episodes and Talk:Futurama (season 6)/Archive 1 (as well as my response at Talk:Futurama (season 6)). There have been multiple discussions on this matter, and it is clear that the consensus is to maintain the production order. The broadcast order has no actual meaning. It was not the intended order the producers had in mind for the showing, and it has no consistency across different countries. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I warned people on both sides of the issue with one line notifications. Nickhop supported broadcast order before, I still notified him. I skipped opponents (Scott Alan Kline and one other) because when I re-read the old debates they were not being civil (other people said it first on those debates). I skipped all IPs on both sides. Stop acting like you're the majority, most past consensuses have resulted in production order. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 17:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

The hidden note was because we had a case of IPs and newly registered users bypassing the talk page and reverting the list. The simple matter of the fact is each time we had a debate on the issue the consensus always fell on the side of the production order, meaning of the users who have participated in this debate, you are a minority. Regarding the sortability, see my response on the talk page. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

List of Survivor (U.S. TV series) contestants
Over the past few months, there has been a section added to the list containing information on the total number of days multi-season players have played. It has grown into quite a large table. I brought up some concerns on the talk page. Your opinion on the matter would be appreciated. I don't want to see the inclusion of this new section knock the article from FL status. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

2012 WikiCup
Hi! As you've previously expressed interest in the competition, I'm just letting you know that the 2012 WikiCup is due to start in less than 24 hours. Signups are open, and will remain so for a few weeks after the beginning of the competition. The competition itself will follow basically the same format as last year, with a few small tweaks to point costs to reflect the opinions of the community. If you're interested in taking part, you're more than welcome, and if you know anyone who might be, please let them know too- the more the merrier! To join, simply add your name to WikiCup/2012 signups, and we will be in touch. Please feel free to direct any questions to me, or leave a note on the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! You are receiving this note as you are listed on WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Please feel free to add or remove yourself. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Canadian Press Team of the Year Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2003 World Ice Hockey Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 31 December 2011 (UTC)