User talk:Scorpyiajansidanananananananana

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. &mdash; mark &#9998; 10:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Indonesian rupiah
You are correct, the Indonesian rupiah is not the official currency of East Timor. Please do not make this edit a third time, or it may be considered vandalism which can lead to you being banned from editing wikipedia. regards Merbabu 10:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree with Merbabu. Please to not make sneaky edit with political implication. These edit will be reverted just like obvious vandalism. See WP:NPOV. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Your name
We are asked when we encounter a user name like yours - to - ''If you believe someone has chosen an inappropriate username under Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here. However, before listing the user here, please consider contacting the user on his or her talk page and bring their attention to the problem and Wikipedia:Changing username. Names that are offensive, inflammatory, impersonating an existing user, or asserting inappropriate authority will generally be permanently blocked by admins.'' I believe your user name requires some careful consideration as to appropriateness. There are issues about over- sized names as well. Perhaps if you consider constructive editing rather than those above you have been alerted to, you may well be required to shorten your name. Take care, and read the introductions to Wikipedia carefully SatuSuro 11:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Kalaallisut language
I believe that you are trying make good contributions to this article, but you're actually damaging it. Please use the preview button before saving in order to verify if your edits will disrupt it. Also, please don't sign your name directly on the article. Thank you.-- Hús  ö  nd  01:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Moldova
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Khoikhoi 03:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. MKoltnow 03:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. MKoltnow 03:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on January 14 2007 to Moldova
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 11:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)