User talk:Scotia14

February 2014
Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Stephen McNeil without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey - these edits were not a mistake. The information previously provided on the page does not coincide with the citations, and the entry is written in hyper-partisan language against Mr. McNeil.
 * I disagree. The information in the text you deleted is directly supported by the provided citations.  I don't find the language overly partisan, although there is a question of whether the coverage gives undue weight to these early issues.  McNeil has only been in office a few months; it may well turn out that these faltering first steps will be long forgotten in the history of his administration.  But that is an issue that should be brought up on Talk:Stephen McNeil, rather than simply deleting the content, which has the appearance of suppression in support of partisanship.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)