User talk:Scotmonk

January 2017
Hello, I'm Qaei. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Troy Southgate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qaei    &#9742;  16:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page For Britain has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to For Britain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  11:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on For Britain. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  11:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring, continuing without logging in once you had been warned of a possible block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.