User talk:Scotsgent101

July 2016
Hello, I'm Brianhe. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Belstaff have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - Brianhe (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ditto for Alpinestars and the other articles you have been adding inappropriate links to (aka spamming). - Brianhe (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Brianhe, I'm a bit confused. I've just googled the Sabotage Times and you're right, they seem to be a content creation agency but I don't understand what was wrong with the other links I added? I saw the articles had boxes above asking for references/citations so I started adding them. What did I do wrong? Thanks, J
 * Do you not see a problem with a retailer's blog and a product catalog being used as references at J. Barbour and Sons?
 * https://www.outdoorandcountry.co.uk/blog/barbour-and-the-household-cavalry-polo-team/
 * http://www.ejchurchill.com/the-shop/barbour-spring-collection/
 * Please review WP:RS before adding more links. - Brianhe (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I should have read the guidelines before adding the links. Are the links from the Independent and the Telegraph okay to be added? Should I try find reputable citations to replace the dodgy ones? What do you do if you can't find a citation? Do you just delete the claim? Thanks
 * Yes of course The Independent and The Telegraph are considered reliable. If you ever have a question, you can ask on the article's talkpage, or at the reliable sources noticeboard. Also please sign your talkpage comments with four tildes (~). - Brianhe (talk) 23:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your help.Scotsgent101 (talk) 12:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)