User talk:Scotsgreg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:10LarkspurLanePopUp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:10LarkspurLanePopUp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:10LarkspurLanePopUp.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:10LarkspurLanePopUp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes to Nancy Drew and ND Mystery Stories articles
Dear Scotsgreg,

Please see Avoid peacock terms for an explanation of why I have modified your edits. In your edit summary reverting the page back to your changes, you said that your wording was not peacocky and that you were "correcting inaccuracies." As you will see from Avoid peacock terms, that is not the case, and changing "high-quality old dustjackets" to "pristine art elements" or "pristine vintage art elements" or whatever, is not "correcting" anything but rather using a more flattering synonym. Your entire edit history indicates that you have one agenda, which is to promote a product. Please do not revert the page again. Ricardiana (talk) 00:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nancy Drew has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)