User talk:Scott Rowland

Hello, I'm Karl Dickman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jeremy Siegel because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Karl Dickman talk 21:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Siegel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Karl Dickman talk 21:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jeremy Siegel with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Spencer T♦ C 21:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremy Siegel with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.  Spencer T♦ C 21:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion (ceiling fan vandal). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)