User talk:Scottcampbell195

March 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. RadioFan2 (talk) 23:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Campbell (Young Entrepreneur)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scott Campbell (Young Entrepreneur), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Autobiographical. There are references but little indication of why this person is notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan2 (talk) 23:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Twitter. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Andrew Sachs. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Catgut (talk) 23:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I strongly suggest you stop farting about and concentrate on creating good content. Your own article may well survive, but only if you have people here on your side; so far, that isn't showing. -- Rodhull andemu  00:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Net News Daily
I have nominated Net News Daily, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Net News Daily. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wperdue (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)