User talk:Scpearson1

Welcome!
fuck you

Hello, Scpearson1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial


 * Thank you. We are an organization taking donations from thousands of people knowing we will help the cause they support, looks like our best course of action will be to forward Wikipedia´s messages to our supporters so they can understand how your organization tries to shoot down smaller causes and allow larger ones to basically advertise. We will instruct our supporters to write and submit pages so you can enjoy more of what you do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scpearson1 (talk • contribs)


 * yea, we need you to explain why you support large organizations only, AARP, ASPCA, Humane society, etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scpearson1 (talk • contribs)


 * The relevant guideline is WP:Notability. It's beyond the scope of Wikipedia to have an article on every organization in existence. That's why the notability standard exists. The general notability guideline is that an organization that has gotten substantial (in-depth) coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources is notable enough to have an article. There are also specific guidelines for various categories of articles, including those about organizations, such as non-profits. To that end, larger organizations with longer histories are more likely to have gotten coverage. Yes, it may make the encyclopedia "top-heavy" toward large organizations, but the community feels that's a better position than being swamped by small ones.


 * Also note that notability implies that the organization is known beyond a local area. Again, local organizations generally don't meet this criteria, but national organizations are more likely to. Local chapters of national organizations are rarely, if ever, notable enough on their own for an article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * To clarify the situation in another way, Wikipedia doesn't carry articles to "support" anything. It doesn't carry articles on infrared spectroscopy, pneumonia, or the Temple of Vesta to "support" them. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lifechow
Hello Scpearson1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lifechow for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Margalob (talk) 00:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lifechow


A tag has been placed on Lifechow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 01:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)