User talk:Scrabbleship

⅓Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Ragib 02:22, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Transportation in New York City
Hello Scrabbleship - I noticed your work on transport-related articles in New York. Transportation in New York City has been nominated to be a US Collaboration of the Week. Check it out and if you like it, please vote for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:USCOTW We need all the votes we can get! Wv235 22:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

US Collaboration of the week
You have voted for Transportation in New York City on WP:USCOTW. It was selected to be this week's winner. You are invited to contribute to improve Transportation in New York City in any way you can. Cmadler 13:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 24% for major edits and 17% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 90 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 00:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Capital District WikiProject?
If you want other people to help with the writing of Capital District-related articles as well, maybe you should consider starting a Capital District WikiProject. :) --Kuroki Mio 2006 00:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

WAWB-TV 65 Page
Yo, What's up Scrabbleship,

This is Time1, you can merge the WAWB-TV 65 page to the WUPV page and I promise I won't restore this page again.--Time1 13:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

WAMC
Wouldn't a proper page move be better than a cut and paste move on this article (in order to preserve the history)? I will merge the page histories later when I have some time. Have you done this before, let me know and I will merge those too. Feel free to contact me anytime you need help, I can delete the target article for you when necessary to effect a proper move :-). NoSeptember   talk  22:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I tried doing a proper page move, however at the time I thought the existance of "WAMC" being a disambiguation page for "WAMC (Albany)" would not work. Right after I did the cut-and-paste, I realized my simple error. I'll do the switcharoo at some point so that the history of "WAMC (Albany)" becomes that of "WAMC". Scrabbleship 23:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I took care of it. The North Carolina station is in Goldsboro (see List of radio stations in North Carolina by city) but has no article. You are right that WAMC should not be a redirect just because of a minor station. NoSeptember   talk  00:08, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

WLNS
Where are you from? Obviously not Mid-Michigan as I saw the changeover from WJIM-TV to WLNS. Steelbeard1 01:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Before this gets out of hand, here is the text of a New York Times summary dated July 20, 1983 announcing Gross's sale of WJIM-TV to Universal Communications aka Unicom aka Bakke Communications (all one in the same).

''The Universal Communications Corporation has agreed to buy two television stations - WJIM-TV in Lansing, Mich., and WKBT-TV in La-Crosse, Wis. - from Gross Telecasting Inc. of Lansing for $45 million in cash.

Universal, which is owned by Forstmann Little & Company and a former CBS president, John D. Backe, announced previously that it plans to become a broad-based communications company. Recently it acquired WRGB-TV of Schenectady, N.Y., from the General Electric Broadcasting Company.''

As the saying goes, six of one, half dozen of the other. My apologies Scrabbleship 03:21, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

How do you explain the on-air name of WLNS's owner being Backe Communications? Please mention Backe or face having the section revised again. Steelbeard1 11:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Albany, NY Arbitron Ratings
I noticed that you removed these ratings and didn't see an explanation on Talk or the edit summary. Without that info, it's difficult to tell if an editor is vandalizing pages. Antonrojo 03:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I had neglected to put a reason for their deletion, and I apologize. I did it for a variety of reasons namely that new ratings will arrive in a few weeks and that having them on that page is both very atypical and clunky. Also, it may be slightly risky to put such ratings in an article given that several years back Arbitron went on a streak where threatening letters were sent to several message boards which went as extreme as barring the posting of statements such as "WXXX is #3". I should also mention that that policy was both selective enforcement and that I am vhemently against such restrictive policies.
 * In short, it was clunky and too much information and not having them in the main Albany, New York article flows better. Anyone who has spent considerable time in Albany proper (or lived out of town and heard the Andrew Wilkow take on the city) knows that there is no way that WGNA-FM is #1 in the city limits. Thanks again. Scrabbleship 11:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Cdta nabi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cdta nabi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I know this is a bot posting, but for those who are reading those pictures are my own work. I merely had neglected to put in a licence and the problem has since been fixed.Scrabbleship 00:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

M6 Triplets
I never knew that the M6's had automated announcements; were they initially disabled, or just plain never worked? Keo 06:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

CW Tennessee template
I added the UPN and WB links to the CW and MyNetworkTV templates because at least for the next two weeks, those networks still exist. However, whether they are listed or not is a trivial matter. Lee359 13:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Erin Esurance
There was an on-going discussion regarding whether Erin Esurance should be merged with the Esurance article. The flow of the relatively young debate seemed to favor keeping the articles separate, but I see that you have combined the pages today. Please show me where a consensus was reached regarding this issue, or if you acted unilateraly, please show me the specific Wikipedia policy regarding the handling of marketing mascots and/or any other Wikipedia policies that may have influenced your decision. Thank you. -Ntmg05 02:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Belo Corporation
Hello. I notice that you've done a reversion of an attempt to trim the Belo Corporation template. I'm not going to do any reversions as to avoid an edit war, but it'd be nice if this template could be trimmed somehow. perhaps a single-row with vertical columns for each broadcasting company would be a nice way to organize. drumguy8800  C   T  07:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Template:NYC Metro Radio Markets
Hi there. I agree that this template was overkill and started to clutter the templates themselves (I went ahead and removed it). On that note, I'm also thinking about merging a few of the templates under Template:New York FM and Template:New York AM (i.e. Long Island, Middlesex, Stamford, and Poughkeepsie) with the separate markets represented. The person who did the Template:SF FM did it in a nice way so that we don't end up with San Jose and San Francisco colliding.

My mission started out looking for hard to find templates (i.e. Template:F/H/V FM, which was Fresno, CA). As a result, I put them on a list under List of United States radio markets so that people would know where these templates were because I couldn't find them myself to begin with.

Anyway, I hope I have not frustrated you. (I probably did as well as several other people) By the way, I liked the way you redid the Long Island and Riverhead templates.

Best regards,

--Jjc104 02:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Metro-North Railroad
I've made the changes you've suggested; it proved easiest to semi-split the New Haven into the component branches. If you could take a look at the present state of things and advise any other changes I'd be most appreciative. Sorry for the inconvenience. Mackensen (talk) 06:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

WTMM and WEEV
Thanks of taking care of this for me. I wasn't exactly sure how the new wikilinking would work with the change in station frequency and callsign. Jasebasketball 19:35,2 January 2007(UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Capitalregionscw.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Capitalregionscw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Broome County Transit
I've made a few minor changes. Are you a bus buff? I am and worked in transit (not BCT) for many years. Cheesebox 03:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 18:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wkkf.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wkkf.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  19:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

CDTA
Hi. I want to clean up and delete some of the trivia - esp. the section on the retired fleet. Is it really necessary? Bearian 01:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help on Lark Street, too. Bearian 00:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wcbi am.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wcbi am.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wcbi am.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wcbi am.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wgna.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Wgna.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Hudson Valley Radio
A tag has been placed on Template:Hudson Valley Radio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wahu.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wahu.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wcbi am.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wcbi am.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:MNTV Maryland
A tag has been placed on Template:MNTV Maryland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:MNTV Montana
A tag has been placed on Template:MNTV Montana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:99 logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:99 logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!
The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!
The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wahu.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Wahu.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Connecticut Radio Markets
Template:Connecticut Radio Markets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Exchanges in area code 413


The article Exchanges in area code 413 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The uncited list is said to have 'numerous errors' anyway. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There are no other lists of this type on the encyclopedia."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Exchanges in area code 413


The article Exchanges in area code 413 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The page Area code 413 covers this much more within the guidelines of WP."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 05:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SagamoreHill Broadcasting


The article SagamoreHill Broadcasting has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let&#39;srun (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WEDG-TV for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WEDG-TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/WEDG-TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of SagamoreHill Broadcasting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SagamoreHill Broadcasting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SagamoreHill Broadcasting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Let&#39;srun (talk) 03:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Banks Broadcasting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banks Broadcasting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Banks Broadcasting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Let&#39;srun (talk) 12:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TWTV7


The article TWTV7 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "MOS:DABNOLINK, not useful for readers."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)