User talk:Scrapbkn

Welcome
Hello, Scrapbkn, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana    (bananaphone  21:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - MrX 20:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Census of Quirinius
I posted this after you post in Quirinius Talk and wanted to make sure you read it. ____________________________ Agree with most of your points. The problem is finding someone who will cut the bad stuff out of the article and whip it into shape in a fair and neutral manner. The non-Christians are so intent on ensuring that "everyone" knows that the Bible is crap (and therefore want to make sure the lede says so) and the Christians are intent on ensuring that the Wiki narrative stays absolutely faithful to the Biblical account. So random editors come in, add and subtract as they see fit and you are left with what we have and no one with an interest in really improving the page has time to follow it through. IMO, this is true with many Bible pages on Wikipedia where the (predominantly) secular editors war against the Biblical ones and concensus is hard to gain without ticking off one party or the other.

That being said, you seem to have both a (passing) interest in the subject as well as knowledge in writing techniques and methods - you don't need to know the subject in depth to be able to honestly read through it, correct obvious mistakes, and cut out the chaff. Think about it. Yours - Ckruschke (talk) 20:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Ckruschke

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)