User talk:ScratchClubYoutube

March 2016
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Galactica (roller coaster) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GoneIn60 (talk) 11:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

ScratchClubYoutube, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Galactica (roller coaster) has been reverted. Your edit here to Galactica (roller coaster) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r53BxlkKiU, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r53BxlkKiU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Siah Kamar, Asadabad
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Leucanopsis oblonga has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Heterodontosaurus, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ian Rose (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WIZZIT. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Dcirovic (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leucanopsis oblonga, you may be blocked from editing. Dcirovic (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Trout bum
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  15:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Monroe Edwards. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Monroe Edwards was changed by ScratchClubYoutube (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960239 on 2016-04-06T15:33:48+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —S MALL JIM   15:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Daisy Jugadai Napaltjarri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Daisy Jugadai Napaltjarri was changed by ScratchClubYoutube (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86709 on 2016-04-17T09:03:53+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Norvell. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Scott Norvell was changed by ScratchClubYoutube (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855696 on 2016-04-17T09:04:51+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CYP2A7, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: CYP2A7 was changed by ScratchClubYoutube (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861657 on 2016-04-17T09:07:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)