User talk:Scream4Lover1

December 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Austin & Ally episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Geraldo Perez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Geraldo Perez, you may be blocked from editing. bogus block messages Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Please explain why you think credited writers should not be listed in the episode they were responsible for. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:30, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at List of Austin & Ally episodes. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/GLCFan1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)