User talk:Screven94

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I notice by your edits you appear to be interested in editing meteorology related topics. Wikipedia has groups of editors who work together to improve articles related to meteorology. You may find one or more of these groups to be of interest: At any rate, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or else place helpme and your question at the bottom of your talk page. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:48, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and how to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
 * WikiProject Meteorology, the parent project which focuses on general meteorology and anything not covered in the projects below
 * WikiProject Tropical Cyclones, which focuses on subtropical and tropical cyclone related topics
 * WikiProject Severe Weather, which focuses on severe thunderstorms and related topics
 * WikiProject Non-Tropical Storms, which focuses on non-tropical storms and related topics

2008 Super Tuesday tornado outbreak
A section does not need to be massive to be inclusion-worthy. It is smaller than the other sections, sure, but it still includes a good bit of information which may interest or be useful to readers. The section was in the article at the time of the article's original good-article assessment over eight years ago, and I don't see the need to remove it now. Dustin ( talk ) 00:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

In response to "I think it was a pretty sloppy section," if you see any issues, either bring them up on the talk page or, if you are willing, directly intervene to correct the problems. You say information is missing? Then why not add it? These solutions strike me as better than removing information in such situations. Dustin ( talk ) 01:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of North American tornadoes and tornado outbreaks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Grove, Missouri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tornadoes of 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mid-Atlantic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)