User talk:Scrimblobimblo

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Clark Stacey have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Clark Stacey was changed by Scrimblobimblo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861149 on 2022-02-19T14:05:21+00:00

Welcome!
Hello, Scrimblobimblo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Clark Stacey did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Linking to copyright violations
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Clark Stacey, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Important notice
Please do not use user-generated content as a source, and please do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source. Repeatedly doing so may lead to a topic ban from the area described in the blue notice above, or to a block from editing, possibly without further warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)