User talk:Scrmbgz

Duel of the Fates
I have once again removed the unreferenced content that you readded to Duel of the Fates. The content needs verifiable secondary sources in order to be included in the article; adding it back without these sources is a violation of Wikipedia's policies. You're right: it's a significant portion of the article's content. But in reality, even more of the content ought to be removed -- I left what I did in the article because it's possible that reliable sources can be found for those assertions. Without verifiability, the whole project falters. I hope you see the importance of adhering to these policies. If you'd like to discuss this, please leave comments on the article's talk page. JDoorjam    JDiscourse 07:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you even read my edit summaries? Or the content of the boilerplate message that you left on  my talk page?  I removed only uncited content.  I also noticed that the recording artist listed on the page, and on a few other pages, is a non-notable recording artist whose page here was prodded and deleted without controversy, so I went about removing it elsewhere.  If you have accurate discussion points about the content that I have removed or refactored, please leave it on the discussion page, or my talk page.  But blind reversion of edits, and inaccurate, boilerplate comments on my talk page, do not help the project become more accurate and trustworthy.


 * Also, removing comments from one's talk page is generally frowned upon, because it makes it more difficult for users to follow the thread of a discussion, and the give and take on issues. Removal of comments on talk pages is typically only done when the content is a personal attack, or is absolutely non-germane to any discussion at hand.  So that it's easy to track the ebb and flow of issues, please do not remove these comments from your talk page.  Thank you, JDoorjam     JDiscourse 01:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I read your summaries, but I don't think you read anyone else’s, or even care. You have in the past consistently removed cited sources from this article, all the while claiming that you weren't.  This is fact.  You talk a good game, but it's only talk.  Your edits clearly show contempt for other contributors.
 * "Contempt"? I'm trying to make sure that the material included in the project is cited.  I'm sorry if you think I have contempt for you -- I certainly don't.  What cited sources have I removed that you keep referring to?  Again, references to other Wikipedia articles aren't considered valid.  JDoorjam     JDiscourse 01:49, 5 December 2008 (UTC)