User talk:Scrumpydilious

Speedy deletion nomination of David Kahn (designer)


A tag has been placed on David Kahn (designer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dmol (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of David Kahn (designer)
Hello Scrumpydilious, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, David Kahn (designer), has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Dmol. This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Dmol. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 08:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Kahn (designer)


The article David Kahn (designer) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reasonable assertion of notability for individual WP:BIO and then article was changed to include company info but not completely deletable by Criteria for speedy deletion as WP:SPAM because not all advertising. Unless some major notability assertions are made this can be uncontroversially deleted or else taken to WP:AfD.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Polargeo (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Polargeo (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * No, of course I'm not affiliated with the company or person in question. If I were, don't you think I'd post a lot bigger article? As I explained in the talk page, the stub came about because I thought the name in the Designer Jeans article needed a link. I have posted many, many times at Wikipedia, but thought I should create a username for creating an article. Geeze, my mistake. --Scrumpydilious (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay I just posted the conflict of interest for information. For the article to be kept you should add information on the person from reliable sources to establish notability, see WP:BIO. Thanks Polargeo (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * As I noted at my talk page I am trying to edit the title of the article to make it clear I am writing about the company and not the person. Can't figure out how to do that.  I also edited the article to make it more straightforward as a stub.--Scrumpydilious (talk) 21:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Currently the article is named after the person so this is not the appropriate location. My advice would be to create the article in your own userspace (say at User:Scrumpydilious/sandbox) and then get someone to review it before putting it in the mainspace. If you are happy with deletion of the article as it stands then I will delete it and put it into your userspace for you to work on. Polargeo (talk) 21:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I've already said I think the article would be sufficient as a stub if the title were changed, in which case there would be no need to delete it. Otherwise, I guess you'll do what you want.  I'm not interested in having it on my user page.--Scrumpydilious (talk) 04:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)