User talk:Scubadiver1752

Welcome!

Hello, Scubadiver1752, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Scuba.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  My 76 Strat  00:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Scuba.com


A tag has been placed on Scuba.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  My 76 Strat  00:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    18:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Articles for creation/. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Your article needs to have a neutral style of writing. It seems very advertisement like and biased.

Thank you for your contribution and hopefully you would continue to help to make it a better encyclopedia

regards

abhishek singh (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not post advertising or copyrighted material to this site
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. This is not a business directory and copyrighted material is incompatible with this site's license. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi. I understand your frustration and I apologize for the harsh tone of the template I used, but there are some issues here, all of which can be addressed.  First is conflict of interest.  If you're associated with a product, website or organization, you're generally discouraged to write about it.  I've written about things in which I have personal involvement, but I was extremely careful to follow the neutral point-of-view policy, so yes, it can be done.  Second is the promotional tone of the article itself; it had been deleted multiple times as more promotional than encyclopedic.  Finally, any organization, especially web content, requires a great deal of notability.  If there are any verifiable third-party references such as inclusion in a major publication or other industry news source, those should be used and will likely keep the article from being deleted.  What I can do for you is to create a user subpage.  This is an online page you can work on here on the site but off of the main article space.  I'll create it at User:Scubadiver1752/Scuba.com.  If you see the link as blue, the text is ready to go.  Also, please keep in mind that even if you own the copyright to the text, it still can't be used unless it's released in writing to the Wikimedia Foundation.  I never recommend this since your original copyright is permanently rendered null and void and allows anyone to use it for any purpose.  I hope this helps.  PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scuba.com


A tag has been placed on Scuba.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --  Transity (talk &bull; contribs) 22:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

I deleted your page because it sounded too much like spam
Also, it was difficult to find reliable, independent references. By independent, it must mean that the interests of the organisation and the interests of the news source should be distinct; the Golden Web Awards are hardly notable and eworldwire is a PR service. elle vécut heureuse à jamais  (be free) 23:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd be willing to help you though, though I am not convinced of its notability. For example, I cannot find any independent sources on Google News; while I can find press releases in the archives, press releases are not independent since they are likely paid for by the original company. elle vécut heureuse à jamais  (be free) 02:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scuba.com


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scuba.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It is a rejected submission at Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. j⚛e deckertalk 17:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)