User talk:Scyrme/Archive Q4 2022

Royal Guardsman / Guardsmen
Hello Scyrme and, as you were waiting to re-nominate Royal Guardsman and Royal Guardsmen at RfD following the close of WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 18, I wanted to let you know that you may do that now. Jay 💬 17:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biofabrication has been accepted
 Biofabrication, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Biofabrication help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 23:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the quick response! – Scyrme (talk) 23:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Writing and knowledge in History of Writing
I have now edited the writing and knowledge section to remove tangential information and make the section more explicitly focused on writing. I hope you will find it appropriate to remove the template now. Thanks for the help. Methodical 17:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbazerman (talk • contribs)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Snake handling in religion" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Snake handling in religion and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 19:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Authority control
Hi, are you still interested in discussing improvements to this template? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I tend to get distracted. I've replied over at the template talk. – Scyrme (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Su fei-erh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Su fei-erh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Su fei-erh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Axel Shen (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)