User talk:Sdap2007

Regarding your edits to Politics of Saskatchewan:
Your recent edit to Politics of Saskatchewan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 04:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saskatchewan Party, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saskatchewan Party was changed by Sdap2007 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-29T12:33:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 12:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 26th Saskatchewan general election. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 26th Saskatchewan general election was changed by Sdap2007 (c) (t) deleting 15786 characters on 2007-09-29T22:41:39+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 22:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your ownership of articles
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Cobi(t 23:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. -- Cobi(t 23:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. -- Cobi(t 23:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Politics of Saskatchewan and 26th Saskatchewan general election
First up, I will not e-mail the SDAP before editing as they cannot dictate who can edit Wikipedia as some of the edit summaries have been mentioning. I have been reverting changes for several reasons. Some of the material added such as "Today, the Saskatchewan Democratic Action Party, a party that has become the most powerful political voice in the province" clearly needs a citation. I have no idea how one can make such a claim but if there is a proper citation then I guess it can be allowed. Other comments such as "For many years, NDP sponsored activities in Saskatchewan have improrperly led to an attempt to idoloize the non-Canadian born Tommy Douglas." have too many weasel words. Please remember this is not a soapbox, it is an encyclopaedia. I am not "simply imply our political party is unfounded in our assertions", but rather trying to get you to justify claims like the first example and un-encyclopaedic writing, as contained in the second example. Please note that these are just two examples. If you want to include some of this information it must be done in the proper way. Let's discuss it on the talk pages for the articles first. Furthermore, if this really is being someone from within the SDAP I can hardly see how that is objective. Please see the links I have included before you do any further editing as they point to the Wikipedia policy on these matters. Thank you. Wolfrock 23:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Wolfrock 00:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

SDAP ADDED COMMENT
Are you out of your mind? Blocking a registered political party from commenting on such issues? We have filed a complaint both by telephone and through email with Wikipedia asking for both Wolfrock and Evercat to be blocked and banned.
 * Apparently you still haven't actually read information that the links above point to. There is no one saying that the views of the SDAP should not be reflected on Wikipedia.  But in order to contribute to Wikipedia you have to play by the rules of Wikipedia.  Please actually read ownership of articles, citation,weasel words, edit wars, neutral point of view before you continue editing Wikipedia.  No one wants to block you so please read the information myself and others have provided to you before you continue to edit.  Thanks. Wolfrock 00:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

ADDED by SDAP
We absolutely can dictate this as it is our right to do so under law according to the Election Act of Saskatchewan. Moreover you are not entitled to "DICTATE" your changes. Cease and desist unless you can justify your status under the Election Act of Saskatchewan.
 * I really don't understand how the Election Act of Saskatchewan has anything to do with this. Do you also claim that the Election Act of Saskatchewan allows you dictate exactly what, for example, newspapers say about you? Wolfrock 00:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, no one is dictating changes. In fact, all I have done is revert the page back to what it was before you started making changes.  I have asked you to discuss your changes on the talk page because that is how we do things on Wikipedia when there is controversy.  This is to avoid an edit war which you seem to be intent on.  All I am asking you to do is to follow Wikipedia guidelines when making your edits.  If you do not intend to do that, why are you here?  Wolfrock 00:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

SDAP Comment
h2g2bob ... are you making a legal threat against other wikipedia users? Did you know bob that making such threats are "strickly forbidden" according to the ruling government on planet bob? Or are you just saying that the only threats that can be made are by administrators who have no real other status in their lives?

Let us point out the problem with your situation and how you are abusing your administrator status: Someone could say all Wikipedia administrators are pedophiles and baby eaters. If you registered a few months ago you may be awarded administrator status and you can block or bannish any editing of the comment "ALL WIKIPEDIA STAFF AND ADMINISTRATORS ARE PEDOPHILES AND BABY EATERS." Now there may be no truth in the statement, but you using your admin status just push a button and poof, banishment and blockage.

The restrictions on legal threats are not to keep people from legitimately ensuring the law is respected it is to keep rogue admins like wolfrock, evercat, and h2g2bob from attempting to turn wikipedia into an editing war.

In short, unless you are a political party in Saskatchewan, find something else to do with your hands other than interfering in the activities of other nations and peoples.