User talk:Sdb27/sandbox

Hi Sam, I think your addition will be very helpful to the Wikipedia community. Your sources well noted and your tone was informative and fitting for Wikipedia.

I would recommend: -adding a picture or video so the reader can see how the tests are conducted. -explain the results of the table in the “Effectiveness” section in words. Is the reliability, specificity, and sensibility high? Also I noticed that the range for sensitivity was very large, so maybe comment on why that is. I would also explain how the Orthopedic Physical Assessment Atlas and Video assessed these characteristics and support their conclusion by another peer review. -Also, how much pain constitutes a positive result? Is there a specific pain threshold that constitutes a positive result or is any pain considered a positive result? Suhasini66 (talk) 01:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Major points: I agree with Suhasini, looks like this page could be a really good contribution to wikipedia. The introduction section could use a bit of expanding, and the article in general could use a few more sources to expand on the information so far. A diagram or picture describing the procedure to give the reader a visual could also be very helpful. I imagine an applications section would be good to include, this test seems like it is used often in orthopedics and also probably physical training/therapy (correct me if I'm wrong). The tone is appropriate for wikipedia and easy for the general public to understand. Overall good start!

Minor points: Nothing of note quite yet.

Seanchan26 (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Major Points: The addition of external links to give a visual representation of the test is really good. As well as that, the statistics are a welcome addition to the article. Sources are good as well. If possible, I guess a photo that showed the test in action would be nice in addition to the video to give readers that instant recognition of what is done during the test. Tone is good and the sentences get straight to the point.

Minor Points I don't know if you can actually do this, but it's yet to be added to category so maybe that can be something to do. Branngu (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Major points I think adding a video explaining the procedure would be very helpful. Even if you had to make the video yourself and it doesn't look entirely professional, I think it would greatly help the reader. The sections titled "Effectiveness" and "Test Results" should probably include more statistics from different sources.

Minor Points Also, you might want to vary your sentence structure. Under test procedure, you have one long sentence with a lot of commas. Instead, I think you should separate that sentence into 2 to make it more readable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suhasini66 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 8 April 2016 (UTC)