User talk:Sdm9093

Spam in Aloecure
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Aloecure, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Aloecure is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Aloecure, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I deleted this article, as above because it was spam, as the message above shows you, if you would like it restored and plan to work on it so that it doesn't appear to be spam, then you can send me a message and I'll restore the code to your userspace. The  Helpful  One  17:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''This is now the sixth time you have added the same statement to the Heartburn article. Roughly half of the adds were sourced to the same unreliable sources, and the other half were completely unsourced. Please either find reliable sources (in medical terms) for these claims, or stop adding them to the article as they will be removed. If you would like to discuss, please do so on the article's talk page.'' --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 17:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''This is now the seventh time you've added this claim, again unsourced. Please stop doing this. Or at least discuss this on the talk page, or here, or somewhere. See verifiability for more information concerning why what you are doing is not acceptable.'' --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 18:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Heartburn
Please discuss the rationale for your changes to the Heartburn article on the article's talk page. I have added a new section to do so. So far, you have provided no explanation for why you believe about.com is a reliable source for a medical article (my position is that it clearly is not), or why you think this text should be added. Rather than adding it back without discussion, I would ask you to please discuss what you want to do, and why. Thank you. --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 19:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You appear to have added the same statement back to the article as User:64.62.15.158 (see ). Once again, you have not responded to any attempts at discussion, here or on the article's talk page, and once again you have added the text without any references at all. I have tagged the text as needing citation, and as dubious. Please comment on the talk page so that we can understand your rationale for adding this text, and why you believe that it should be added with no references or with about.com as a reference (given the policies on reliable sources and the guidelines on sourcing medical articles. --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 17:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Space Entrepreneurs Seattle
Hello Sdm9093,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Space Entrepreneurs Seattle for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbdave (talk) 01:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)