User talk:SeaFairy887

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, SeaFairy887. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Lliana Bird, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 02:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Rosguill,
 * The person (Lliana Bird) whose Wikipedia page I edited is a British public figure - radio host, television presenter, filmmaker, author, podcaster, and co-founder of a UK charity organization. I am a Canadian middle school teacher with no ties to this person, their past/present work, or their charity organization. There is nothing in the article that would suggest I am promoting, advertising, or publicizing this individual or her organization. It is an objective, fact-based article with required citations.
 * I do not understand why the page has been taken down if I have not violated any guidelines. SeaFairy887 (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Irrespective of your lack of COI, a longer version of the article was previously discussed at AfD a few months ago, where the consensus result was that Bird falls short of meeting notability guidelines and thus should not have a standalone article. In order to contest this prior decision, you will need to provide sourcing that clearly demonstrates that Bird meets these guidelines. Recreating the article with what appear to be the exact same set of sources is a non-starter.
 * I'd further add that given your sole edit to Wikipedia has been to create an article on this subject, that you used a misleading edit summary in doing so, and that the article has previously been edited by other editors who have had conflicts of interest with the topic, your simple disavowal of a connection to the topic is less than persuasive. signed,Rosguill talk 16:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)