User talk:SeaLion00

Welcome!
Hello, SeaLion00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

September 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Guy (Help!) 08:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

I considered other avenues to control your disruption but in the end there is little point. You are a single purpose account who has come here to Right Great Wrongs. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia, but you have not understood our purpose or policies, and I think it is unlikely you ever will, as your motivation here appears to be purely ideological. Guy (Help!) 08:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

.

This user claims, "I did not remove the Guardian review". However, this appears to be inaccurate. See and  and  where the user did remove the link to the Guardian article. In addition, the user is saying we can work together. Yeap, but not being willing to do so is why the user was blocked in the first case. It is, of course, very possible the user has changed his or her ways; I'll leave it to the next reviewing admin to determine this. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)