User talk:Seabasscampos

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Seabasscampos! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:18, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 (UTC)

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Football League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

May 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adrafinil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. JoeBo82 (talk) 01:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Your one source is an FDA letter to a company that used false claims when marketing adrafinil, and you are using this as a basis to determine that adrafinil is unlawful, despite this not being the case. You have a history of changing this across Wikipedia.
 * It is well-established across case law that adrafinil, when marketed correctly per the DSHEA, is legal in the United States. Seabasscampos (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Dear user,

This is not true. Adrafinil is not a dietary supplement as defined by law, yet again FDA reinforced this. Here is more info, now please prove your claim adrafinil is a dietary supplement as defined by 21 U.S. Code 321(ff). Please prove how adrafinil is a vitamin, mineral, herb or botanical, amino acid, or dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake. The burden of proof is on you to back your claims that adrafinil is a dietary supplement. It is not my job to do that. I’ve already done that for my position, please do the same for yours. '''Ultimately, you have done nothing so far to prove your claim that adrafinil is a dietary supplement. All you have done so far is undid my edits. '''

Thank you for your understanding,

- JoeBo82

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/press-releases/hermitage-man-sentenced-importing-and-selling-drugs-not-approved-fda JoeBo82 (talk) 16:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Did you read your source?
Dear user,

I am respectfully asking whether you read your cited source? The source does not claim Adrafinil is an approved new dietary ingredient and in fact rejects this argument; “For the reasons discussed above, the information in your notification is incomplete and does not provide an adequate basis to conclude that "Adrafinil", when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of your product, will reasonably be expected to be safe. Therefore, your product may be adulterated under 21 U.S.C. § 342(f)(l){B) as a dietary supplement that contains a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a significant or wireasonable risk of illness or injury. Introduction of such a product into interstate commerce is prohibited under 21U.S.C.§33 1(a) and (v)”. Please let me know if you thoroughly read this source before making your claim that Adrafinil is an approved New Dietary Ingredient. Furthermore, do you have any more recent documentation for your claim since this source is older than both the 2019 criminal proceedings and 2019 warning letter.

Thanks,

- User:JoeBo82

https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2017-S-0023-0036

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.

JoeBo82 (talk) 21:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)


 * This issue has been resolved, for the relevant discussion was archived on the 7th of June 2023. JoeBo82 (talk) 02:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)