User talk:Seablade/ Archive 1

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

El Nuevo Día reference
The reference is apparently using the "cite book" template, thus quoting the newspaper itself. However the article is also in the newspaper's website, it took me less than thirty seconds to find it. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Puerto Rico is not a Colony
From Meriam-Webster:

Main Entry: col·o·ny

Pronunciation: \ˈkä-lə-nē\

Function: noun

Inflected Form(s): plural col·o·nies

Etymology: Middle English colonie, from Middle French & Latin; Middle French, from Latin colonia, from colonus farmer, colonist, from colere to cultivate — more at wheel

Date: 14th century

1 a: a body of people living in a new territory but retaining ties with the parent state b: the territory inhabited by such a body

2: a distinguishable localized population within a species

3 a: a circumscribed mass of microorganisms usually growing in or on a solid medium b: the aggregation of zooids of a compound animal

4 a: a group of individuals or things with common characteristics or interests situated in close association b: the section occupied by such a group

5: a group of persons institutionalized away from others ; also : the land or buildings occupied by such a group

Which of those definitions does Puerto Rico meet?

According to CIA World Fact Book, Puerto Rico is "unincorporated, organized territory of the US with commonwealth status". The website for the legislature of Puerto Rico has a link to "The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico". It looks like Puerto Rico is officially a "Commonwealth" and by common sense application of the definition of the word "colony", Puerto Rico is not a colony. As for the links you provide from the UN, they are hardly persuasive. First of all, the UN is an unreliable source of information on questions of the status of nations, territories, etc.. For example, according to the UN, Taiwan is not a sovereign independent nation.

Second, I looked into the links you provided and. The "Special Committee on Decolonization" consists of Antigua & Barbuda, Bolivia, Chile, China, Congo, Cote D'Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Ethiopia, Fiji, Grenada, India, Indonisia, Iran, Iraq, Mali, Papua New Guinea, Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent & the Grenadines, Sierra Leone, Syrian Arab Republic, Timor- Leste, Tunisia, United Republic of Tanzania, Venezuela. So where is North Korea? It's not a complete list of countries that hate the United States without North Korea.

From the second link you provided: "Acting without a vote today, the Special Committee on decolonization approved a draft resolution.  Acting without a vote?  That's supposed to persuade anyone of the unbiased fairness of the committee?  Also according to that page the draft text was written and introduced by Cuba, another unbiased observer of U.S. affairs, no? Readin (talk) 06:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. HkCaGu (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Date linking.
Hi, I noticed you've been arbitrarily linking dates in several different articles. Per WP:MOSNUM, Dates (years, months, day and month, full dates) should not be linked, unless there is a reason to do so. More information can be found at WP:CONTEXT. Thanks! --Loonymonkey (talk) 03:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Talkback
Please respond there. Thanks! Cerejota (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I have reverted your changes until a consensus is reached on the talk page. Mercy was the first of the users that expressed concern with your changes, but Cerejota seems to agree. If you keep acting unilaterally, its quite possible that a less lenient sysop will begin issuing warnings/blocks. Please use the talk page when you are in disagreement with multiple users. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to get involved in this discussion, just discuss it in the talk before continuing to do changes unilaterally. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  06:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)