User talk:Seadoubleyoujay

Re Draft:Squadron 42
I see you have created a draft for Squadron 42, largely by copy-pasting the Star Citizen article. A couple of things you need to be aware of:

Firstly, the notability required to meet Wikipedia policies needs to be established through substantial third-party coverage of the topic itself. I have seen little in the way of such coverage, except in the broader context of Star Citizen. As it stands, the draft would almost certainly fail an AfD discussion, since it fails to demonstrate such independent coverage. See Notability for the relevant policy.

Secondly, if you copy-paste content from one article to another, you must make this clear, per the attribution instructions in Copying within Wikipedia.

109.159.72.250 (talk) 20:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I've only copied the Star Citizen content as a starting point, until the article is submitted, this quite clearly isn't going to be the end result. As of right now, this article is going to be an example to make my case about spinning off the article in the first place. Worst case the final product doesn't meet notability and is deleted. It would need to be completed prior to making an decision like that. —  seadoubleyoujay  [talk]  [contrib]  [海倍君ジェイ] 05:36, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Squadron 42 has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Squadron 42. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

ANI notification
See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I suggest you read Canvassing, and then respond promptly. And note that I have started this thread as a result of what I consider to be your inappropriate behaviour. It isn't an excuse for us to debate the proposed Sq42 split yet again. 109.159.72.250 (talk) 16:55, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Just wanted to give you a warm welcome to the project. Hope you like it here! JOE BRO  64  20:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Seadoubleyoujay, I too wanted to chime in and welcome you to Wikipedia. I missed that whole discussion, but that's not how we tend to do things here. Side note: the 'talk' link in your signature links to User:Seadoubleyoujay/talk, which is a subpage of your user page User:Seadoubleyoujay, you probably want to link to User talk:Seadoubleyoujay, which is this page right here. Again, welcome and happy editing. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Can't believe I missed that, thanks for pointing it out. Thank you both for the welcome, I definitely appreciate it! —  seadoubleyoujay  [talk]  [contrib]  [海倍君ジェイ] 21:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep the Japanese video game titles intact.
You know that a game like Armored Core was made in Japan and had its title spelt with Latin characters. Still, I hope you realize this: Many people in Japan pronounce the name "Armored Core" as "Āmādo Koa" and spell it like "アーマード・コア" because English-language words are pronounced differently in Japan, so keep the Japanese video game titles intact, and don't remove them. Of course people who speak Japanese can spell the name in English letters, but most prefer using Kanji and Romanji to understand the name easier for Japanese language. Good articles and Featured articles about Japanese video games have the 'nihongo foot' template, so please keep this in mind. « ias! |,,.|usbk» 06:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I reverted your original change because of an earlier edit that User:Odokee made that I agreed with. The game is made in Japan, but nothing about the title is Japanese in nature. Also to clarify, Romaji uses the Latin alphabet and Kanji is not used in the series titles, there are a small number of box arts in the series that use Katakana underneath the Latin title.


 * On your first point, people in Japan pronouncing the title as "Āmādo Koa" being a justification is a bit of a stretch. I'm aware that other articles do this, but more often than not its due to a fundamental difference between the two titles (see: The Witcher and Resident Evil) or because the game was marketed with Kana/Kanji in Japan and translated overseas (see: Persona 2: Innocent Sin). What we have here is none of those. Pronunciation differences due to vocal nuances aren't notable enough for inclusion alone, there needs to be something more substantial.


 * On your second point, you claim that "many people" spell it with Kana, but don't provide much evidence to support that. On From Software's official site, the Latin spelling is both the primary box title and the primary product title on the page, Kana is included but just underneath the Latin spelling and given smaller prominence. In this Armored Core 2 commercial, the Latin title is prominently displayed. In this Last Raven commercial, the same thing is true.


 * I'd like to direct you towards MOS:VG, specifically the part that writes "If a game was originally titled using the Latin alphabet, there is no need to include its title in any other writing system." I referenced that in my original revert, but I'm retaining here, since that line from MOS is what drove me to agree with Odokee's initial change and reinforce that change. If you'd like to open a discussion on the main series page regarding the title so we can discuss it further and get outside opinions, feel free to. —  seadoubleyoujay  [talk]  [contrib]  [海倍君ジェイ] 23:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, now I understand. Well I guess I leave the title as it is. I remember that on February 2, 2020, you added the 'nihongo foot' template to the article, then two months later Odokee removes it from the page, and now I just agreed with you about the name of the game. The logo of the game is nothing but Latin alphabet characters. « ias! |,,.|usbk» 00:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Squadron 42
Hello, Seadoubleyoujay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Squadron 42, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)