User talk:Seahorse17/sandbox

Article evaluation
Nice job on your article — I felt like I would have a good idea of chemotherapy for breast cancer if I were reading the article without background knowledge. Some ways I'd suggest tightening up this article:


 * Types section: most Wikipedia articles I've seen would put this type of information in prose or subheadings (rather than bullets)
 * Regimens: right now it seems like it's just a list of various regimens, which I don't think is very useful to the average reader. Perhaps either include fewer regimens, or (if this information exists online) give more details about conditions that warrant the use of the regimens (or a combination: "common regiments include X, used when patient is Y; X2, when the patient is Y2; ...., Xi, when the patient is Yi. Other regiments include A, B, and C." which would give an average reader more useful information
 * Define/elaborate on what the Her2 gene is and what being her2-positive/negative means
 * Minor grammatical points: write out Professor instead of saying "Prof", "granulocyte colony-stimulating factor" should have the article 'a' before it, etc. but I'm sure you'll clean these up.

Great work! StuckInThought (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)