User talk:Seak17

Jim Edmonds
Hi, I just undid your revert to an edit on the Jim Edmonds article. The edit you reverted was perfectly legitimate, and if you didn't agree with it, reverting it was still inappropriate, as it did not qualify as obvious vandalism. Please be more cautious in the future when reverting. Thanks. | Mr. Darcy talk 05:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I updated the article with a cite reference to the Saint Louis Post-Dispatch. I was not reverting it because it was vandalized, I was reverting it to show the more appropriate nickname. Seak17 20:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Seak, the question of which nickname is "more appropriate" is inherently POV; he has two nicknames, both are widely used, and both can be backed up with citations. I've added "Hollywood" back to the article on that basis, without removing "Jimmy Baseball." | Mr. Darcy talk 22:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo webster small.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo webster small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  02:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stephen Gleason


The article Stephen Gleason has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Biography whose sole reference is a dead link; promotional in tone.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 16:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)