User talk:SealSquared/Civic technology

Peer Review
I really like your decision to focus on adding information about civic technology in South America because every other region in the article has a lot of information, but South America has almost none. I really like the tone of your draft as it is very encyclopedic and perfect for an article. One thing I would recommend adding is some hyperlinks to important terms so that users can easily navigate to the page of a term to learn more about it. For example if there is a page on the term 'TEDIC' I would hyperlink it so users can learn about it. I would also maybe add a little more information in each subsection and maybe more subsections such as government-led initiatives and citizen-led initiatives.

Reply

Thank you for the feedback. I will apply hyperlinks wherever I can. I will also look for more articles about the platforms so that I will be able to add more information.

Peer Review
In terms of grammar I found a few mistakes:


 * 1) Users are able to view detailed information of the work the government is doing in the neighborhoods. [works to work]
 * 2) They are also able to download documents and photos of public work that is happening or  has happened. [changed sentence structure]
 * 3) One of these countries is Chile. [remove this sentence because the subsection is already titled Chile

Cfeldmar (talk) 01:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the feedback. I have made the changes you suggested. SealSquared (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review SF
I really like how you chose to focus on one specific section of the article. I would recommend possibly adding the dates when you bring up examples in the article (i.e, in 2011, Brazil established NOSSAS). Also, I believe there are some circumstances where it is ok to use the organization's own website as a source, but double check for your specific case. Also, accessible is spelled incorrectly in the Venezuela portion as well as turn decides to decides in the first paragraph.Besides that, the article is really good! SeenaBerkeley (talk) 01:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the feedback. I have made the changes you suggested.  I will also be looking for more sources talking about these platforms. SealSquared (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Response to pier reviews
I have responded. SealSquared (talk) 23:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)