User talk:Sealbillo/sandbox

'''Peer review ''' I'm reviewing sealbillo's work on Human Rights in the Western Sahara conflict.

Yes the content added is relevant and seems up to date because they are using up to date sources. But, I think the sub-section could be renamed to "Protests," or perhaps the user could add another subsection called "Protests," or maybe "Human Rights Violations as reaction to Protests."

The content is all negative towards the Moroccan government and mainly cites what human rights organizations have said about events, rather than explaining the events themselves.

The content is all reliable, but I think that the user could use more scholarly articles, rather than heavily relying upon websites.

I think the content could be organized better by renaming or adding sections, as I explained above.

I think that the addition of images would enhance the quality of this subsection.

Yes, I think the additions make the article more complete.

Overall, I think that the this a good draft and could be improved if the user includes more scholarly articles and expands on the current information.

Ericaw5 (talk) 00:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Erica Wilson

I apologize for the delay and have finished the peer review on time (April 5th)and made my notes on this page courtesy of the Afircan Politics edu page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sealbillo/Western_Sahara_Conflict/Imwesley_Peer_Review?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review Imwesley (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)