User talk:Sealbock

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 23:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

What? I added a new portion to the discussion section, regarding a request for new, pertinent material, with a good example to back it up, and an offer to provide resources. Note this did not in any way affect the main article, so it could definitely not be construed as vandalism of the article. If you think it constitutes vandalism of the discussion section, then sorry, you're interpreting me very negatively. Anyways, I found you deleted the section I added, and then I moved to restore the section, removing any material that looked offensive. Now I go back and find you deleted my section again. Could you tell me how that constitutes vandalism to make a request for new material, a legitimate input into the discussion section? Isn't the discussion section meant for talking about possible modifications to the article? Sealbock (talk) 02:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No, the section you added also included a highly-inappropriate suggestion that smells and looks like trolling, rather than an actual attempt to help out. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 05:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)