User talk:Sean4780

Copyright problem: Reverse Discrimination (EU Law)
Hello Sean4780! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Reverse Discrimination (EU Law), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://irelandsreversediscrimination.wordpress.com/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Reverse Discrimination (EU Law) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Reverse Discrimination (EU Law), in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Reverse Discrimination (EU Law). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Reverse Discrimination (EU Law) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Reverse Discrimination (EU Law) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

April 22
I feel you need to read wp:spa and wp:not. As well as wp:rs and wp:primary. Slatersteven (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution filing
Advice, this isn't a good idea, and I took the liberty of removing it. You may be having a dispute with Dianaa, true, but the interactions between you and her are over an administrative action she took in pursuing copyright concerns. Dispute Resolution mediation is for times when an article talk page discussion has proved fruitless, and a 3rd party mediator is needed. ValarianB (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I was about to close this dispute before User:ValarianB removed it, and was about to say that disputes about copyright should be handled at Copyright Problems. I will also caution you that, first, Wikipedia administrators always enforce copyright aggressively, without regard to who the editor is, and, second, it is very seldom useful to say that an administrator is being a bully, even if the administrator is being a bully, and in this case User:Diannaa was not, because she was only aggressively enforcing copyright, which is her responsibility.  Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and conduct allegations against administrators are a distraction.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Reverse Discrimination (EU Law)
Hello, Sean4780, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Reverse Discrimination (EU Law), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Reverse Discrimination (EU Law).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status of Reverse Discrimination (EU Law)
Hi. I'm an administrator trying to go through and clear up this page so it's usable and visible to everyone. I saw the note you posted releasing your text under the CC-BY-SA license. That's almost what we need, but I'm afraid it's not exactly what is needed since you are the author. We need a statement that says something like: "The text is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)." That can be added to your Wordpress site (either as a new post just mentioning this material, or as a footer releasing all of your writing under free licenses) or you can send it in an email following the steps at WP:CONSENT. I know this is complicated for using text that you already wrote once, but since it was originally published outside of Wikipedia we have some pretty strict rules which have to be followed. As soon as you post something to the website or email the necessary permissions, if you let me know (you can just reply here) it would be greatly appreciated so I can make the records we need and open the article back up. Please let me know if you have any questions. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * https://irelandsreversediscrimination.wordpress.com/2022/05/18/to-wikipedia/
 * quote
 * to wikipedia
 * The text is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) Sean4780 (talk) 23:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I have to run off to eat here soon, but if you can leave that page up I'll finish getting everything fully sorted in the next few hours. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Another heads up - I've nominated the Irish immigration image for deletion over on Commons. Just because something is freely dissemenated, doesn't mean that we can do the same without legal issues. There's some general guidance here at WP:COPYOTHERS and commons:COM:Copyright rules by territory/Ireland has some information about Ireland specifically. Reusing text from elsewhere on Wikipedia (or images from elsewhere on Wikimedia Commons) can be very complicated even when it seems straightforward, so please don't hesitate to ask around if you have questions. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair dealing of a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that work shall not infringe any copyright.
 * https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ie/ie098en.pdf
 * quote
 * Fair dealing: criticism or review
 * 1.—(1) Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. (2) Fair dealing with a work (other than a photograph) for the purpose of reporting current events shall not infringe copyright in that work, where the report is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. (3) In this Part, ‘‘sufficient acknowledgement’’ means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author unless— (a) in the case of a work which has been lawfully made available to the public, it was so made available anonymously, or (b) in the case of a work which has not been made available to the public, it is not possible for a person without previous knowledge of the facts to ascertain the identity of the author of the work by reasonable enquiry. Sean4780 (talk) 16:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd appreciate it if you talked to me, rather than just copied and pasted text. Regardless, Wikimedia Commons does not host media under fair use/fair dealing, they have to actually be in the public domain or freely licensed. Here on Wikipedia, we do allow a limited amount of copyrighted material under fair use, but it has to meet all of our significantly stricter non-free content policy and guideline. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)