User talk:Sean hongkong

Speedy deletion nomination of YFYJupiter
Hello Sean hongkong,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged YFYJupiter for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danrok (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
OK. First, please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. We don't give BloggsCo an article just because Hussain, Kelly & Cohen, Inc and The LardyCake Purveyors Association have articles. Second, you need to read WP:CORP about notability for companies, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove it. Third, articles must be written in an encyclopaedic manner, and that means no offers, no solutions, no passion, no enthusiasm - 'for more details, please see' WP:NPOV. You weren't too bad on that score - I've seen some that even a PR enthusiast with a passion for offering colleague-driven results in verticals and horizontals would have difficulty understanding. After your reading, think - and then look for references. If you can't get references, there's no chance. But if there's no notability, there's no chance either. Catch 22a. Look at more articles. If you can't see how they match the policies, ask. You might be right - they mightn't have what is needed. Have a go at that and do the reading again. Over to you. Peridon (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

By the Author
Thank you for the feedback. That is very clear and helpful. We may try and take another crack at getting our subject posted. Again appreciate your time to communicate what we were missing. Sean