User talk:Seanbond5

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chris Brown (American entertainer). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Also, don't revert edits without giving a reason. It's unconstructive and will most likely be reverted as well. Dan56 (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Usher (entertainer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to All of the Lights. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 18:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to American Gangster (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Reasonable Doubt (album), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
In a recent edit to the page The Lord of the Rings, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  17:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Would you mind using an edit summary? Not that it would change your changes to the article being unnecessary. Grammy Awards arent a must in every lead. The point of the lead is to summarize the most important aspects of the article's body. Dan56 (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been asked before to provide an edit summary before saving your changes to an article, which you did not do at Kanye West. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at God Forgives, I Don't, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Channel Orange. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 21:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Channel Orange. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. You have been asked before to provide an edit summary before saving your changes to an article, which you did not do at Channel Orange. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 22:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Geographical locations are not linked (Manual_of_Style/Linking), and everything in the lead is already sourced in the rest of the article (WP:LEAD). If you dont look at any of WP's policies and avoid edit summaries, then there's no chance of defending yourself as editing in good faith when facing a block. Seriously, reconsider. Dan56 (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)