User talk:Seandelaney2

Regarding your changes to Northern Ireland: it is a country, and this has been discussed and researched many times before. We are not reverting you just to be difficult. Hadrian89 (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

The UK is a sovereign state made up of four constituent countries. We're sure on this one. Take a look through the talk page archives (and the United Kingdom article) before you start edit warring next time. Hadrian89 (talk) 13:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop edit-warring on Northern Ireland: numerous editors have reverted you based on consensus, prior discussions, references from reliable sources that describe Northern Ireland as a country, etc. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 14:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I thought that if you don't believe us you might believe the government's own website - not that you're still editing the article, but it might restore your faith in Wikipedia. Hadrian89 (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Please don't edit war on this issue. Northern Ireland is not a country, but is a "constituent country" for description within the UK purposes. In the general sense it's not a country. Let the stable version stand. Tfz     22:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The user had stopped editing long before my last comment - I was just trying to show that this wasn't true. Hadrian89 (talk) 23:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Honestly speaking, there are many untruths in Wikipedia, especially of the pov-nature, I could show you 100 in the next 5 minutes. But I don't touch those articles, life is too short. But some day I might just take on one or two for the 'fun & excitement'. Better have my cites ready.) Tfz    01:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Canterbury Tail  talk  22:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)