User talk:Seankpat

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Neal Adams with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Neal_Adams&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 00:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Neal Adams with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Not constructive to remove entire section
Removing an entire section in Neal Adams for the reason you give is not constructive. The material is a notable part of Adams' biography. It is not a referendum on scientific legitimacy or accuracy, but only reflects information in reliable sources. Please discuss it on the talk page instead of wholesale removal of text you don't agree with. --MichaelNetzer (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2012 (UTC)