User talk:Seanx820

Copyright problem: Solicited-node multicast address
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Solicited-node multicast address, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2461 and http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Solicited-node multicast address and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Solicited-node multicast address, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Solicited-node multicast address with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Solicited-node multicast address. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Solicited-node multicast address saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that even though RFCs are intended to be widely distributed, they are still copyrighted and subject to restrictions regarding derivative works. See for example the Full Copyright Statement on the last page of the documents I linked to. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * can you link me to where RFCs can have strips linked to them? I am fairly certain you are incorrect about this, it says specifically on their page that they want it shared, I did not just cut and paste the whole article, I took parts of it (1-2 sentences) then put in examples and information... I don't think you have the right to just delete the whole article Seanx820 (talk) 17:40, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by "strips linked to them". As to the rest, the examples should be fine, but you copied the other sentences verbatim from the RFCs - I don't propose deleting the articles, but it needs to be rewritten in your own words (sufficiently so to avoid closely paraphrasing the source and creating a derivative work, which is the issue here). VernoWhitney (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the bad english, I am tired. OK this is what is confusing to me, I don't understand why I can't copy.  If you read BCP 78 which the IETF uses for all legality it references RFC 5377.  In there section 4.2 specifies that it is OK!
 * "There is rough consensus that it is useful to permit quoting without modification of excerpts from IETF Contributions. Such excerpts maybe of any length and in any context.  Translation of quotations is also to be permitted.  All such quotations should be attributed properly to the IETF and the IETF Contribution from which they are taken."


 * SO why can't i quote a sentence here or there, it looks like they intended for this?


 * The issue begins with the fact that you weren't quoting, you were simply copying the text and putting it together with examples. You are correct that you can quote a sentence here or there, but you need to do it within policy; specifically WP:NFCC says "Articles and other Wikipedia pages may, in accordance with the guideline, use brief verbatim textual excerpts from copyrighted media, properly attributed or cited to its original source or author, and specifically indicated as direct quotations via quotation marks,, or a similar method" (emphasis added). The WP:NFC guideline goes further and states
 * If all you're doing is establishing a definition, there is no POV, and probably no need to illustrate a point or establish context, so that means there's probably no reason to allow them under the guideline. Even if you do use some quotations, you can't have an article that's entirely quotations plus some examples (that would be excessive, and thus prohibited). What it comes down to is that there's no reason that the same information can't be rewritten using your own words. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * understood, I have reworded, make comments on the discussion page and I will fix it further :) thanks for the clear and concise advise, some people on wikipedia delete my stuff without telling me whats up :) Seanx820 (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for listening and for rewriting those! It's much appreciated. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for listening and for rewriting those! It's much appreciated. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)