User talk:Search Party 3.0

Hello

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eminem has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eminem was changed by Search Party 3.0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9626 on 2019-06-10T19:29:04+00:00

Bill Fagerbakke
Hi. When you add something that is unsourced, challenged, and removed, it's not helpful for you to just stick it back in as it was. It's your responsibility to provide cites that back up what you've added. The Bill Fagerbakke article at the moment certainly says he is an actor who acts comedic roles, but says nothing about him being a comedian. If you have anything that can be referenced that says or shows he is a comedian, then please add them as cites. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 19:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kanye West. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me!   02:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Level 3 warning is also due to unexplained blanking in this edit. StaticVapor message me!   04:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Eminem. StaticVapor message me!   08:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Also added unsourced content to Kanye West.... again. StaticVapor message me!   08:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lil Wayne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StaticVapor message me!   21:39, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Search Party 3.0. StaticVapor message me!   21:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC)