User talk:Searcher770

Welcome!

Hello, Searcher770, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Pierina Gilli‎
With regards to this article, please see pages like WP:MOS to help you format it properly, and also have a read of WP:NEUTRAL, as much of the page currently is written in overly promotional terms, and needs a drastic rewrite-- Jac 16888 Talk 16:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also please read WP:WEASEL, your edits are currently making the article worse-- Jac 16888 Talk 17:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are, but you can reply to me here instead of my talk page, and you only need to sign once. I really suggest you read the pages I pointed you to, and WP:FIRST as well, because at the moment that page is in need of drastic improvement-- Jac 16888 Talk 19:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pierina Gilli young.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pierina Gilli young.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Pierina Gilli grave site.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pierina Gilli grave site.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pierina Gilli.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pierina Gilli.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Pierina Gilli
Hi, I just wanted to explain my recent edit of this article as you are a major contributor to the page. I have removed all the youtube links as these are unrelated to the subject of the article itself and there are potential copyright issues as well. I have also removed all the self referenceing to other wikipedia pages as this goes against WP:CIRCULAR guidlines. Like it was suggested above by another editor, I think you shouls read WP:MOS, WP:NEUTRAL and WP:PEACOCK. These pages will help you understand the correct style and tone to use when adding information to an encyclopedic article. You may also want to read WP:RELIABLE to get an idea of what kind of sources are exeptable for referencing. If you have any problems you can let me know on my talk page or the article talk page. Thanks. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Pierina Gilli
Hi, Sarah. I am disappointed at your editing. However, I understand the restrictions that must be maintained. Unfortunately, such has already changed the tone that I was hoping to achieve -- and therefore, I am abandoning this article. Searcher770 (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Im sorry to hear you are abandoning the article, I dont think you need to. You clearly know a lot about the subject and care about the articles development. I think you just need to remember that wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, has to present information in a certain way, with a neutral tone. If you dont feel comfortable adding more to the article itself, maybe you could add suggested changes, or relavent links on the article talk page for other editors, I think that could be beneficial.Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Pierina Gilli
I have decided to try again to edit the article, conforming to the Wikipedia guidelines, as I understand them (problable not so well still, since I am really new to all of this). Please be gentle with your feedback, and please help me to improve the article. Thanks, Sal Searcher770 (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Searcher770/Mary the Mystical Rose has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mary the Mystical Rose, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Re:copyedit of Pierina Gilli
Glad I could help. I am not a subject matter expert, so the article may have errors in the accuracy of the subject. I did the best I could to make it flow and more readable. Please check it over in detail to see if it is correct in fact and content.  Buster40004  Talk 12:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mary the Mystical Rose concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mary the Mystical Rose, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Mary the Mystical Rose


Hello Searcher770. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Mary the Mystical Rose.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)