User talk:Seasonalweathers

November 2014
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 02:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Haminoon. Your recent edit to the page Ex-gay movement appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Haminoon (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Ex-gay
Wikipedia is unaware homosexuals are putting false content on this site. Now they will know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seasonalweathers (talk • contribs)

You incorrectly cited this source on that article. That is not a reliable source. That is a feedback loop. Wikipedia is the source there. Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Honestly it sounds like you are making conspiracy theory with the changes you have attempted. It really looks like you are a new user. Has anyone told you where you can go and learn to edit properly?-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 08:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Haminoon. Your recent edit to the page Ex-gay movement appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Haminoon (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello again. You are edit warring. You have violated WP:3RR. You could be reported and receive a block. I don't want to report you. You need to learn how to edit. You can go to the Teahouse and get help there.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 08:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Haminoon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ex-gay movement— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Haminoon (talk) 08:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Welcome...
Hello, Seasonalweathers, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

P.S.: Some pages you might like to check out are:


 * Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia – main welcome page.
 * Introduction – Wikipedia introduction page.
 * Tutorial – Wikipedia editing tutorial.
 * Questions – the "where to ask questions" directory.
 * FAQ – quick answers to the most common questions.
 * New contributors' help page – a place for new users to post questions and get answers by volunteers who monitor or frequent the page.
 * Help desk – where volunteers answer questions on how to use Wikipedia. Many new users go there for help too.
 * Adopt-a-User – where a new user can be adopted by an experienced user who will be his/her mentor.
 * Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual – Thorough and intuitive guide to Wikipedia. -Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ex-gay movement with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Haminoon (talk) 08:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Same-sex marriage with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 08:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rainbow flag (LGBT movement), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rainbow flag (LGBT movement) was changed by Seasonalweathers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891568 on 2014-11-10T08:55:43+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Your recent editing history at Ex-gay movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Coffeepusher (talk) 13:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Nat Gertler (talk) 18:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)