User talk:SeattleChronic

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Grunge links
Don't worry about the links. There's a tendency in Wikipedia to overlink and grunge rock probably is not the only thing that is linked in the Seattle article multiple times. The removal of the links was in no way a reflection of your editing and more a reflection that there are a ton of links in the Seattle article and that anything to reduce that is a good thing. --Bobblehead 00:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

My bad
Sorry to make you take the time to write me! I'll admit that I didn't even look at your source, and that I reverted in error. Surely, though, you can understand my thought process - I see an edit that includes very obvious vandalism (the "Austin likes to smoke pot" bit), and I assume that the other two parts are nonsense information. Though I don't know anything about the subject, I agree with you that a relevant sourced piece of information should be included in Wikipedia, and that reverting it immediately without reason would be kind of a dick move. Sorry again to waste your time. --Beefnut 03:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Welcome
No problemo! I saw your name in the user creation log, and saw that you had already contributed, so I welcomed you. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) (Review me!) 04:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ahhhhh. I saw "Austin likes to smoke pot" too, and you're right that that's obvious vandalism.  I can totally understand how you would think two edits in a row might be a vandal trying to cover his tracks, so no worries.  We're all trying to help here, well most of us anyway, no hard feelings at all.  SeattleChronic 21:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Plural of "woman" is "women" not "womens"
Your edit is wrong. "Women's rights" is correct. Apostle12 09:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lake Washington Boulevard


The article Lake Washington Boulevard has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Road does not establish its WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Lake Washington Boulevard for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Lake Washington Boulevard, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lake Washington Boulevard until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Admrboltz (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)